STAFF DECISION (3430) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. In order to partition land in the UD (URBAN DEVELOPMENT) zone the following regulations apply: (a) Existing lots with dwellings may be separated from the remaining property provided: (1) The location of lot lines shall not significantly reduce feasible options for the future location of urban roads or services, or preclude basic development options on the property or adjacent properties. If the applicable comprehen- sive plan designates the property for single family residential uses a development plan may be required which demonstrates that the proposed division will not preclude future subdivisions achieving the median density proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. (2) Any additional street right-of-way required by adopted standards is dedicated along the lot's street frontage. (3) If the dwelling is within 300 feet of a sewer line capable of serving the dwelling, the dwelling shall be connected to the sewer. (4) Street and drainage improvements applicable to any street abutting the dwelling lot shall be required at the time the remnant parcel is developed through an improvement agreement. (b) The minimum lot size for partitioning and lot line adjustments shall be 6,000 square feet for the dwelling lot. If the dwelling lot is proposed to be larger than 15,000 square feet a redevelopment plan shall be required demonstrating that the proposed dwelling lot meets subsection (a) (1). The location of lot lines on the dwelling lot shall conform to the yard requirements of the RS zone. 7. The applicants' partition request will separate three existing dwellings, situated on a 24,393 square foot parcel, into three individual lots. The newly created 12,393 square foot lot contains enough land to partition in the future. According to Marion County Assessor's information, two of the residences were constructed in 1940 and the third in 1910. These construction dates occurred prior to adoption of the Marion County Zoning Ordinance that required land use review for placement of dwellings on the property. Based on the submitted site plan and information provided by the applicants, the accessory structures meet required setbacks to proposed property lines. Given the fact that surrounding properties are developed and partitioned, and with a review of the submitted site plan, it appears that this proposal will have no affect on future development options for these properties. Criterion in 6(a)(1) is satisfied. 8. Marion County Public 'Works indicated that adequate dedicated street right-of-way exists, but a radius corner at the intersection of Hayesville Drive and Reimann Street is needed and must be shown on the final prat. They also indicate that frontage improvements are not required at