Laserfiche WebLink
"3. and 14f': <br />~ Re 14 f. That can be answered 'yes' or'no.' If no, there is nothing to <br />provide. If yes, then what does the assessment consist of? <br />Re paragraph 3, that is merely a finding. No additional <br />information is requested. <br />> 14g. This can be answe~ed at you meeting with Bond Counsel present. <br />> 14h. and 13. We have refined this service impact analysis and are ready <br />> to present to the committee. We are also exploring with the Board a <br />> statement on "substantil impact". <br />> <br />Re 14h and 13: Please send what you have. <br />15., 17., and 18. These items have been given directly to the Board of <br />> Commissioners for their action. I did give them a letter from me that I <br />> thought the past actions should be investigated by a third party for <br />> potential disciplinary action. If you are serious about pursuing these <br />> issues 1 suggest you be specific about the "mistakes" that you make <br />~ > reference to in the report and direct those spec~c issue directly to the <br />> two Boards. <br />> <br />> I suggest that we set April 14th. as the next meeting of SPOC, this will <br />> give us time to share our staff worlc with the two Boards, schedule the <br />> consultants you have requested and get all the material to you at least a <br />> week before the meeting (the first week of April will not work because <br />> some of the consultants you requested to meet with are not in town). <br />> <br />> I await your direction. Hope this helps understand where we are with <br />> your requests. Thanks for your work on the interim report. <br />> Bily <br />> <br />CC: John Mcmillan ymcmilla@willamette.edu> <br />~ <br />