Laserfiche WebLink
generate space projections, and a letter from Arbuckle Costic describing the programming initially <br />~ done. Randy has scheduled a meeting with 7erry Vessello (SPOC committee member) for his <br />review of this report. Other suggestions for the report included listing "date as of...." be included <br />in the ~planation as well as WEGroup data being the base source of information. This report will <br />be sent to SPOC after Jerry's review. Transit's space was not included, but they will prepare a <br />report with similar formatting. Randy Curtis will provide information from Arbuckle Costic to <br />transit to assist in the preparation of their portion. <br />Item 6 Renovation Costs of Courts <br />Randy Franke has made contact with the courts regarding their space needs for the courthouse. <br />Ra.ndy Curtis will follow up with Judge Lipsomp and/or 7im Murchison for a rough diagram of court <br />needs floor by floor. If necessary, 7udge Lipsomp will be invited back to address concerns of <br />SPOC regarding the courts future space needs. Billy Wasson felt 7ustice Peterson would be able <br />to take care of McMillan's court issues raised eazlier. <br />Item 4 Budget Process <br />Budget Process issue will be addressed at a meeting Friday morning between county and transit. <br />Item 4 C Service Impact & Item 3 Lease Study <br />Ken Roudybush will address the issue of service impact and give a brief status report. Ken did a <br />sa.mple diagram on the boazd on service impact based on information that staff has developed. R. G. <br />Andersen-Wyckoff noted that based on the service impact issue, it may well change the question <br />~ from what do we cut if we build Courthouse Square to what do we cut if we don't build Courthouse <br />Square. <br />Ken handed out a copy of the proposed Request for Proposal to furnish lease rates. One change <br />suggested to the RFP will include an hourly rate for presenta.tions to administrator and/or <br />committees. Since the project has been under criticism, stai~s position is to seek a 3rd party to give <br />credibility to the numbers generated by staff. Justice Peterson is aware that we are seeking a 3ra <br />party lease study to confirm our numbers and that it will take time to receive this information. <br />Response to Chamber of Commerce's Questions <br />John Whittington reported that the response to the Chamber of Commerce's questions will be <br />finalized, presented and signed jointly by both boards. Additional comments will be given to John <br />by Cazol Fischer, who was not able to attend today's meeting. The parking issue/question was also <br />revisited. Ra.ndy Curtis reported that we need to explore the option of additional eastside parking <br />for the downtown area with the private sector in the area. A possible solution or strategy county <br />could use later on with relative little cost would be to "float" parking in the new structure. Staff <br />recommendation was for Billy Wasson and John Whittington pursue our commitment for parking <br />altematives with city staff, but not advocate specifics. <br />Item 8 Downtown Association Position <br />R.G. Andersen-Wyckoffreported the Downtown Association did not have a position on the project. <br />He asked Monica McLin to put the item before the Executive Committee to deal with keeping <br />~ <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />