My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Analysis and Feasibility Report (2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Project Analysis and Feasibility Report (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 4:44:22 PM
Creation date
9/6/2011 10:43:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10308
Title
Project Analysis and Feasibility Report
Company
Gardiner & Glancy LLC
BLDG Date
7/1/1996
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Project Coordination
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
C. County stays on the Senator Block site to develop its County Service Center and <br />Transit relocates to another site? <br />1. Marion Counry would have to refund Salem Area Transit's <br />properiy acquisition. <br />2. Marion County and Salem Area Transit must pay off all <br />outstanding contracts for demolition, abatement, relocation, <br />contamination mitigation, architecture & engineering, project <br />management, legal, and financial and environmental consultants. <br />Transit would not qualify for federal grant participation in these <br />payments and, therefore, would have to pay its share of these <br />costs from the District's general fund. Because Transit would no <br />longer own a portion of the land, the costs related to demolition <br />and abatement would no longer be shared by Transit. <br />3. County would need to retain architectural consultant and begin <br />design of County facilities. <br />4. County and Transit would Iose cost-sharing potential which <br />would have been inherent in the joint Courthouse Square <br />developmen~ <br />5. County would need to negotiate with others regarding whether or <br />not underground parking option should be considered prior to <br />building of county building. <br />6. Transit would need to identify and acquire an off-street site for <br />the downtown transit center and pay for demolition, abatement, <br />relocation, architecture & engineering, project management, <br />legal, and environmental consultants. Transit's portion would be <br />eligible for federal grant financing, however the District will <br />have lost $2,569,146 million in the land acquisition grant, lottery <br />funds, and unrecoverable costs Transit paid on Courthouse <br />Square. <br />Cn2 ~nrnat ir?° »2siss 4 <br />Page # <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.