My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Analysis and Feasibility Report (2)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Project Analysis and Feasibility Report (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 4:44:22 PM
Creation date
9/6/2011 10:43:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10308
Title
Project Analysis and Feasibility Report
Company
Gardiner & Glancy LLC
BLDG Date
7/1/1996
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Project Coordination
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
B• Transit stays on Senator Block site to develop downtown transit center and <br />County moves its County Service Center to another location?' <br />~ 1. Transit would need to negotiate with Count to convert 42 <br />y % <br />undivided interest in Senator Block to specific ownership and <br />obtain additional property from County, if necessary. <br />2• Marion County and Salem Area Transit must pay off all <br />outstanding contracts for demolition, abatement, relocatian, <br />contamination mitigation, architecture & engineering, project <br />management, legal, and financial and environmental consultants. <br />Because the County would not be issuing revenue bonds its <br />portion of these expenses would have to be paid from the <br />County's general fund. Some of Transit's portion may be <br />- eligible for federal grant financing. <br />3. Transit would need to retain and fund an architectural consultant <br />and begin design of transit facilities to fit transit owned property <br />footprint. <br />4. Counry would need to move Counry agencies out of the <br />Courthouse to accommodate the State Circuit Courts for Marion <br />County, and provide permanent facilities for departments <br />~, temporarily housed in the Best building on Lancaster Blvd. <br />5. County and Transit w~ould lose cost-sharing potential which <br />would have been inherent in the joint Courthouse Square <br />development. <br />6. Transit would n~ed to negotiate with others regarding whether or <br />not underground parking option should be considered prior to <br />building of transit facilities and whether or not partnering in the <br />design and use of the site would be necessary to reduce <br />ine~ciencies in land use. <br />~ 7. County may choose to retain its portion of the Senator Block for <br />future use or may sell it at current reduced market value. <br />8. Marion County would have to repay the intemal loan from the <br />solid waste management fund from General funds. <br />9. Transit would need to negotiate with Ciry regarding streetscape <br />financing. <br />Ch2 "What If?" i/29/9s 3 <br />Page # <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.