Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)

Home Browse Search

ONGOING ISSUES ~r Parking 7-10 Leonard has done a preliminary layout of P1. He has laid out two scenarios with stall counts at 369 (option 1) and 372 (option 2). The City conveyed mixed signals regarding the concept of expanding under the sidewalk. ACTION: Mike Hayford to review revised designs to determine impact on structural. Dave to price cost of revised plans. Randy and R.G. to meet with the City to begin work on obtaining revocable sidewalk permit. Ron to send Leonard detail on RDP tree well . Acoustical / Vibration 6-27 MMDC recommended that we bring on an acoustical consultant to assist in addressing sound isolation issues. MMDC has contacted Russ Altermatt and Associates. Russ can prepare a budget after reviewing structural and architectural plans. ACTION: MMDC will contact Russ to request a proposal. Rev. 7-3 MMDC to transmit plans to Russ and discuss scope of proposal. Permitting 7-10 Leonard met with the City to discuss code issues. Leonard discussed two potential issues identified by the City. 1) exiting into a service area from the SE corner stairwe112) limiting the roof garden to strictly an ancillary use of the meeting azea. He indicated that the City would probably require a written acknowledgement of the limitations on its use. ~ Leonard also indicated that review for issuance of the foundation permit is approximately eight weeks. 6-27 Craig expressed a concern with adequate budget coverage of permits and fees. The team discussed some specific permit and fees, e.g. sewer and water hookup, traffic impact, building permits, etc. Dave indicated that Kevin Newland from his office would be meeting with the city to gather additional permit and fee information. Craig would like to have Rick Williams attend. ACTION: Dave and Leonard will do additional permit and fee research. Rick and Kevin will set a time to meet with the city. Rev. 7-10 Dave and Leonard will forward any existing paperwork relating to permits or fees to MMDC. Environmental ~ 7-3 The group discussed approaches for removing contaminated soils. Remove prior to mass excavation or as a part of. Pence / Kelly has no money in the budget for hauling or treating contaminated soil. Randy was concerned about slowdown in project in order to deal with soil. ACTION: Kathleen will attempt to quantify dollars involved with removing contaminated dirt. Dave will attempt to quantify schedule impacts. Rev. 7-10 It was decided that the probable best approach is to clean the site prior to mass excavation. Staton to develop price to remove contaminated soils by 7-24. Dewatering 7-10 If P 2 is no longer being considered, Mike H. does not require the completed GRI drilling report. Dan asked that the data gathered be sent to Marion County in case of future