Laserfiche WebLink
~~ ~ ~ ~ <br />Buses need to be able to access and depart from the facility using streets that carry relatively <br />--- limited traffic volumes. Routings must be sble to be d~veloped in a fashion~that provides direct, <br />quick travel through the downtowa area, avoiding streets and intersections which are <br />overcrowded with auto traffic. _ <br />Other features that are needed in an efficiently designed transit ceater include: <br />Good pedestrian fiow, with adequate room for arriving and departing riders as well as <br />general public users of the sidewalks around the transit facility <br />Of increasing importa.nce, the transit center must meet the standards of the Americans <br />with Disabilities Act (the ADA). There must be sufficiem room for petsons in <br />wheelchairs to navigate the passenger loading areas and proceed sai~ly with other <br />transit riders. <br />Weather protection is more than a convenience to transit customersr-it is a public <br />service that i~ required if transit is to be able to attrac:t new riders and be considered as <br />a viable altemative to the private auto. Consider the city's investment ove,r the past 20 <br />years of $850,000 in the downtown weather protection program, as an indication of the <br />importance of such amenities to the downtown community and its customers. <br />Safety is one of the most critical concems. In terms of design, this means good lighting, <br />separation from downtown tra~c, eliminating the need to cross streets to access buses, <br />and adequate space to move people and buses through the facility with good visibility. <br />Close proximity of customer services, such as ticketing, enclosed heated and lit waiting <br />areas, transit informatioq and access to system administrators and policy makers . <br />Convenient access to the downtowa core area is one of the fundamental factors in <br />deciding the issue of facility location Surveys of transit customers confirm the <br />importance of close proximity to the major shopping and employmert opportunities <br />Of grimary importance to the future of the Cherriot system, a transit facility design <br />needs to be sufficiently flexible to accommodate growth in routes and riderstup. <br />Ridership in 1997 grew 25% over'96 levels. Current plans project the potential for an <br />additiona120% to 30'~o increase in the next two to three years. <br />TI~ EXISTIlVG FACILITY <br />The current "Cherriot Station" was constructed in 1983 by the City of Salem. The need for the <br />facility arose from a planned change in the direction of one-way downtown streets, known as <br />the State-Court couplet. Fourteen Cherriot routes had been stopping at curbside along H'igh <br />St. between State and Court, Court St. from H'igh to the alley west of H'igh, Court St. just east <br />of H'igh, and on State St. east of I~'igh. The reversal of travel direction on Court and State <br />streets eliminated about hatf of the curb frontage that had been available to the Cherriots, <br />effectively ending the usefulness of the curbsides for a transit facility. <br />4 <br />