Laserfiche WebLink
C. Couuty stays on the Senator Block site to develop its County Service Center and <br />Transit i•elocates to anothei• site? <br />1. Marion County would have to refund Salem Area TransiYs <br />property acquisition. <br />2. Marion Counry and Safem Area Transit must pay off all <br />outstanding contracts for demolition, abatement, relocation, <br />contamination mitigation, architecture & engineering, project <br />management, legal, and financial and environmental consultants. <br />Transit would not qualify for federal grant participation in these <br />payments and, therefore, would have to pay its share of these <br />costs from the DistricYs general fund. Because Transit would no <br />longer own a portion of the land, the costs related to demolition <br />and abatement would no longer be shared by Transit. <br />3. County would need to retain architectural consultant and begin <br />design of County facilities. <br />4. County and Transit would lose cost-sharing potential which <br />would have been inherent in the joint Courthouse Squaze <br />development. <br />5. County would need to negotiate with others regarding whether or <br />not undeiground parking option should be considered prior to <br />building of couuty building. <br />6. Transit would need to identify and acquire an off-sU~eet site for <br />the downtown transit center and pay for demolition, abatement, <br />relocation, architecture & engineering, project management, <br />legal, and environmental consultants. TransiYs portion would be <br />eligible for federal grant financing, however the District will <br />have lost $2,569,146 million in the land acquisition grant, lottery <br />funds, and um~ecoverable costs Transit paid on Courthouse <br />Square. <br />