Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br /> 10 <br /> 11 <br /> 12 <br /> 13 <br /> 14 <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br /> 17 <br /> 18 <br /> 19 <br /> 2O <br /> 21 <br /> <br />Page <br /> <br />existing park. The expansion of the park would not change <br />this state of affairs. <br /> <br />(b) Statewide Goals <br /> <br />In addition to the exception criteria contained in the <br />administrative rules, applicants must demonstrate compli- <br />ance with the remaining applicable Statewide Goals. <br /> <br />Statewide Goals 4 through 13, and 15 through 19 do not <br />apply to this application. <br /> <br />DLCD commented that Goal 14, Urbanization, did apply and <br />an exception to this goal would be required to expand a <br />mobile home park. The application is for the expansion of <br />a recreational vehicle park in a rural area. Goal 14 is <br />not, therefore, applicable to this application. <br /> <br />B. ~ONE CHANGE <br /> <br />MCZO Chapter 123, which governs zone changes, does not <br />contain specific criteria that must be satisfied before a <br />zone change may be allowed. In this case, if the Hearings <br />officer's conclusion that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment <br />should be denied is adopted, the requested ID zoning would <br />not be possible because the area would remain designated <br />for primary agriculture. <br /> <br />According to the rural development policies of the Marion <br />County Comprehensive Plan, expansion of ID zoning at any <br />particular interchange shall be considered only when all <br />designated lands are committed to development or are shown <br />to be unsuitable for the proposed use. Compelling evidence <br />must be provided of the need for additional land at the <br />particular interchange. These standards have not been met <br />in this case. <br /> <br />The economic goals of <br />and a strong tourist <br />proposed use. <br /> <br />increased employment opportunities <br />economy would be furthered by the <br /> <br />The energy policies that development should progress in an <br />orderly fashion and energy efficiency should be promoted <br />by adjacent development (rather than "leap frog" develop- <br />ment) would be served by the proposed use. <br /> <br />Under. MCZO 123.071, a zone change allowing a more intensive <br />use of property may be conditioned on the provision of <br />buffering or off-site public facilities. Imposition of <br />such conditions is permissible when they: <br /> <br />ZC/CP/CU 89-4/RECOM/4ENDATION - 5 <br />(ISBERG) <br /> <br /> <br />