Laserfiche WebLink
4. The applicants are proposing to adjust the property lines on a 0.90-acre parcel, a 6.63-acre parcel, a 2.44-acre <br />parcel and a 3.25-acre parcel to consolidate them from 4 parcels to 3 and create a 6.42-acre parcel, a 3.12-acre <br />parcel, and a 3.47-acre parcel. <br /> <br /> In the process of reviewing the application, it was found that tax lot 400 (the 3.25-acre tax lot) is comprised of 2 <br />separate legal parcels and tax lot 100 (the 6.63-acre tax lot) is also comprised of 2 separate legal parcels. In both <br />cases, a 1-acre lot of the same configuration as subject tax lot 300 was partitioned off by deed in the 1940’s and <br />no consolidation of these separated lots occurred in the chain of title. Upon bringing this to the attention of the <br />property owner, they decided to not include either of the two 1-acre parcels found by staff and leave them in their <br />current configuration. Only the larger pieces of the tax lots will be included in a modified proposal. <br /> <br />5. Various agencies were contacted about the proposal and given an opportunity to comment. <br /> <br />Marion County Surveyor’s Office commented: <br /> <br />1. Properties 10 acres or less must be surveyed per ORS 92.060 (7) and the survey submitted for <br />review. <br />2. Survey checking fee required at the time of review. <br />3. Property line adjustment deed(s) shall be recorded with the Marion County Clerk’s Office. Per <br />ORS 92.190 (4). <br /> Other comments specific to this Planning Action: <br />“Multiple PLA’s can be filed on one map using as many sheets as necessary for the sequence of <br />events to be understood.” <br /> <br />Marion County Assessor’s Office provided information regarding taxes on the subject properties. <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. <br /> <br />6. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an TC zone are listed in Chapter 17.138.080(B) of the <br />Marion County Code. These criteria are as follows: <br /> <br /> 1. Parcels larger than 80 acres may not be reduced to below 80 acres. <br /> <br /> None of the parcels involved in this application are larger than 80-acres and as such cannot be reduced below 80- <br />acres by this proposal. Therefore the criterion is met. <br /> <br /> 2. Parcels smaller than 80 acres may be reduced or enlarged provided: <br /> a. If the tract does not include a dwelling and does not qualify for a dwelling under MCC <br />17.138.030(A) or (B), any reconfiguration after November 4, 1993, cannot in any way enable the <br />lot or parcel to meet the criteria for a new dwelling under MCC 17.138.030(A) or (B). <br /> <br /> There are two parcels that currently do not contain a dwelling involved in this proposal that will not be consolidated <br />into another parcel with a dwelling. These are the 2.35-acre southern portion of tax lot 400 and the 5.63-acre portion <br />of tax lot 100. None of the parcels are eligible for lot-of-record dwelling qualification under MCC 17.138.030 (A), <br />as they have been bought or sold multiple times since 1985 to different owners. The portion of tax lot 400 that does <br />not have a dwelling has been bought and sold with the other parcel comprising tax lot 400 since at least January 1st, <br />2019, making it part of a tract that had a dwelling on that date and thereby disqualifying it from qualifying for a <br />template dwelling under MCC 17.138.030 (B). The larger parcel comprising tax lot 100 was not part of a tract on <br />January 1st, 2019 as it was purchased by the current owner after that date, and research into the ownership on that <br />date found that the parcel was not part of a tract that had a dwelling, meaning there is a possibility of a templ ate test <br />dwelling being qualified for. However, based on the criteria for a template test dwelling, there must be at least 11 <br />parcels within a 160-acre square or rectangle centered on the subject tract, and based on running example template <br />tests using just tax lot 100 found that there are only 9 parcels that are picked up by rearranging that square or <br />rectangular shape. However, this does not account for the 2 parcels discovered in the research of this case, meaning <br />the true number of parcels in the area is in fact 11, which is the amount of parcels required to meet the template test