CU25-049 PC Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(C) An assessment of whether all identified impacts of the proposed use when considered together could have a significant impact to any farm or forest operation in the surrounding area in a manner that is likely to have an important influence or effect on that operation. (D) For purposes of this subsection, examples of potential impacts for consideration may include but are not limited to traffic, water availability and delivery, introduction of weeds or pests, damage to crops or livestock, litter, trespass, reduction in crop yields, or flooding. (E) For purposes of subsection (a) and (b), potential impacts to farm and forest practices or the cost of farm and forest practices, impacts relating to the construction or installation of the proposed use shall be deemed part of the use itself for the purpose of conducting a review under subsection (a) and (b). (F) In the consideration of potentially mitigating conditions of approval under ORS215.296(2), the governing body may not impose such a condition upon the owner of the affected farm or forest land or on such land itself, nor compel said owner to accept payment to compensate for the significant changes or significant increases in costs described in subsection (a) and (b). 2. Adequate fire protection and other rural services are, or will be, available when the use is established. 3. The use will not have a significant adverse impact on watersheds, groundwater, fish and wildlife habitat, soil and slope stability, air and water quality. 4. Any noise associated with the use will not have a significant adverse impact on nearby land uses. 5. The use will not have a significant adverse impact on potential water impoundments identified in the Comprehensive Plan, and not create significant conflicts with operations included in the Comprehensive Plan inventory of significant mineral and aggregate sites. The Planning Commission finds these criteria do not apply. 8. Notwithstanding MCC 17.110.270 and 17.120.075, home occupations, including the parking of vehicles in-conjunction with the home occupation and bed and breakfast inns, are subject to the following criteria in MCC 17.136.060 (C): (a) A home occupation or bed and breakfast inn shall be operated by a resident of the dwelling on the property on which the business is located. Including residents, no more than five full-time or part-time persons shall work in the home occupation (“person” includes volunteer, nonresident employee, partner or any other person). (b) It shall be operated substantially in: i. The dwelling; or ii. Other buildings normally associated with uses permitted in the zone in which the property is located. (c) It shall not unreasonably interfere with other uses permitted in the zone in which the property is located. (d) A home occupation shall not be authorized in structures accessory to resource use on high-value farmland. (e) A sign shall meet the standards in Chapter 17.191 MCC. (f) The property, dwelling or other buildings shall not be used for assembly or dispatch of employees to other locations. (g) Retail and wholesale sales that do not involve customers coming to the property, such as internet, telephone or mail order off-site sales, and incidental sales related to the home occupation services being provided are allowed. No other sales are permitted as, or in conjunction with, a home occupation. The Planning Commission finds the criteria do not apply.