Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The vacant tract involved in this proposal is actually the parcel getting smaller and would not be increasing to a size <br />that would qualify the parcel for a dwelling. Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />b. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that contains an existing dwelling or is approved for <br />construction of a dwelling to a size smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size, if the abutting <br />vacant tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger tha n the minimum tract size <br />required to qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; <br /> <br />The vacant tract involved in this proposal is actually the parcel getting smaller and would not be increasing to a size <br />that would qualify the parcel for a dwelling. Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />c. Allow an area of land used to qualify a tract for a dwelling based on an acreage standard to be <br />used to qualify another tract for a dwelling if the land use approval would be based on an <br />acreage standard; or <br /> <br />None of the subject parcels in this proposal were previously used to qualify a tract of land for a dwelling. Therefore, <br />the criterion is met. <br /> <br />d. Adjust a property line that resulted from a subdivision or partition authorized by a Measure 49 <br />waiver so that any lawfully established unit of land affected by the property line adjustment is <br />larger than the size granted by the waiver. <br /> <br />Neither of the subject parcels in this proposal were part of, or created by, a Measure 49 waiver. Therefore, the <br />criterion is met. <br /> <br />5. Any property line adjustment that results in an existing dwelling being located on a different parcel shall <br />not be subject to the standards in MCC 17.136.030(A) so long as the adjustment: <br />a. Does not increase any adverse impacts on the continued practice of commercial agriculture on <br />the resulting parcels; <br />b. Does not increase the potential number of dwellings on the resulting parcels; and <br />c. Does not allow an area of land used to qualify a tract for a dwelling based on an acreage <br />standard to be used to qualify another tract for a dwelling if the land use approval would be <br />based on an acreage standard. <br /> <br />No dwellings would be located on a different lot or parcel as a result of this proposal. Therefore, this criterion does <br />not apply. <br /> <br />8. Under MCC 17.172.120(E) Property line adjustment deeds shall be recorded with the Marion County clerk’s <br />office prior to submitting the property line adjustment survey, if a survey is required. Deed recording reference <br />numbers shall be noted on the required survey. <br /> <br />9. The resulting lots shall significantly conform to the site plan submitted with the proposal. Minor variations are <br />permitted upon review and approval of the Planning Director. <br /> <br />10. Based on the above findings, the applicants’ proposal meets the criteria for a property line adjustment in an EFU <br />zone. The property line adjustment request is, therefore, APPROVED. <br /> <br /> <br />Brandon Reich Date: November 3rd, 2025 <br />Planning Director/Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />If you have any questions regarding this decision, contact Alexander Seifer at (503) 588-5038 <br /> <br />Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder, Vendor or Seller: ORS Chapter 215 requires that if you receive this Notice, it must <br />promptly be forwarded to the purchaser.