My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PLA25-042 Staff Decision
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
2025
>
Property Line Adjustment
>
PLA25-042 Staff Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2025 9:13:13 AM
Creation date
11/3/2025 9:13:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
25-042
Document_Date
11/3/2025
Land Use Type
Property Line Adjustment
Tax_Lot_Number
042W280001600
Document_Type
Decision
Site_Address
6084 KIRSH RD NE
Additional Info
042W280001500
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
1. No survey required for properties greater than ten acres per ORS 92.060 (8). <br />2. Properties 10 acres or less must be surveyed per ORS 92.060 (7) and the survey submitted for review. <br />3. Survey checking fee required at the time of review. <br />4. Property line adjustment deed(s) shall be recorded with the Marion County Clerk’s Office. Per ORS <br />92.190 (4). <br /> <br />Marion County Assessor’s Office provided information regarding taxes on the subject properties and indicated <br />that there are unpaid taxes on the subject parcels. According to ORS 92.095, all delinquent taxes and interest as <br />well as taxes, which have become a lien during the tax year, must be paid before a partition shall be recorded. <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. <br />7. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an EFU zone are listed in Chapter 17.136.090(C) MCC. <br />These criteria are as follows: <br /> <br />1. When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the <br />minimum parcel size pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the same number of lots or parcels shall <br />be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to <br />the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be <br />reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than th e minimum <br />parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not <br />apply to those lots or parcels. <br /> <br />The proposal involves one parcel larger than the 80-acre minimum parcel size for the EFU zone and one parcel <br />smaller than the minimum parcel size. The applicants propose to transfer roughly 1.3-acres from the parcel larger <br />than 80-acres to the smaller parcel. The large parcel will still be over 80-acres in size as a result of the proposal, <br />meaning the end result is 1 parcel over the minimum size and 1below—the same as before. Therefore, criterion is <br />met, but it shall be made a condition of approval that at least 1 parcel remain larger than 80-acres. <br /> <br />2. If the minimum parcel size in subsection (A)(1) of this section is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel <br />subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the <br />lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. <br /> <br />The proposal involves one parcel larger than the 80-acre minimum parcel size for the EFU zone and one parcel <br />smaller than the minimum parcel size. The local minimum parcel size based on the calculation identified under <br />MCC17.136.090 (A), which only takes into account the average size of parcels over 40 acres. Only 2 other <br />parcels met the requirements for the calculation, one of which was 302-acres in size, so the local minimum parcel <br />size came out to 190-acres. The applicants propose to transfer roughly 1.3-acres from the parcel larger than 80- <br />acres to the smaller parcel. The large parcel will still be over 80-acres in size as a result of the proposal. <br />Therefore, criterion is met, but it shall be made a condition of approval that at least 1 parcel remain at least 80- <br />acres in size. <br /> <br />3. Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable <br />for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. <br /> <br />The proposal will transfer an area of 1.30-acres from the large farm parcel to the smaller, non-farming related <br />dwelling parcel. The area encompasses an existing barn and small grass pasture ground (as referred to by the <br />applicants). None of the area used as commercial farm fields is included in the proposed transfer of land and the <br />transferred area is relegated to a corner of the large parcel and would not impair the ability of the field to be farmed <br />normally. The configuration is as suitable for commercial agriculture as the existing conditions. Therefore, the <br />criterion is met. <br /> <br />4. A property line adjustment may not be used to: <br />a. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that, before the relocation or elimination of the common <br />property line, is smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size for the applicable zone and contains <br />an existing dwelling or is approved for the construction of a dwelling, if the abutting vacant <br />tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to <br />qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling;
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.