Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The proposal will transfer roughly 11-acres of land from the larger parcel to the smaller parcel. The <br />identified area of transfer consists of the entire area of the larger parcel that is open and grassy—the area <br />that can be used for agricultural purposes. The rest of the large parcel is dedicated to a large woodlot that <br />does not appear to be an intentional commercial timber stand, which is permitted as a use. Transferring the <br />entirety of the cleared area that can be used for farming consolidates the farmable area instead of splitting it <br />up, meaning it is in a configuration that is still as suitable for agriculture as before. The criterion is met. <br /> <br />4. A property line adjustment may not be used to: <br /> <br />a. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that, before the relocation or elimination of the common property <br />line, is smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size for the applicable zone and contains an existing <br />dwelling or is approved for the construction of a dwelling, if the abutting vacant tract would be <br />increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to qualify the vacant <br />tract for a dwelling; <br /> <br />The proposal will increase the size of the parcel that has the existing dwelling, and the vacant lot will <br />reduce in size. This criterion restricts the opposite, where the dwelling parcel decreases in size to make a <br />vacant one larger. Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />b. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that contains an existing dwelling or is approved for construction <br />of a dwelling to a size smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size, if the abutting vacant tract would <br />be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to qualify the vacant <br />tract for a dwelling; <br /> <br />The proposal will increase the size of the parcel that has the existing dwelling, and the vacant lot will <br />reduce in size. This criterion restricts the opposite, where the dwelling parcel decreases in size to make a <br />vacant one larger. Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />c. Allow an area of land used to qualify a tract for a dwelling based on an acreage standard to be used <br />to qualify another tract for a dwelling if the land use approval would be based on an acreage <br />standard; or <br /> <br />Neither of the two subject parcels have been used to qualify for a dwelling based off an acreage standard. <br />Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />d. Adjust a property line that resulted from a subdivision or partition authorized by a Measure 49 <br />waiver so that any lawfully established unit of land affected by the property line adjustment is larger <br />than the size granted by the waiver. <br /> <br />The subject parcels were not created as a result of partition or subdivision authorized by a Measure 49 <br />waiver. Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />5. Any property line adjustment that results in an existing dwelling being located on a different parcel shall <br />not be subject to the standards in MCC 17.137.030(A) so long as the adjustment: <br /> <br />a. Does not increase any adverse impacts on the continued practice of commercial agriculture on the <br />resulting parcels; <br />b. Does not increase the potential number of dwellings on the resulting parcels; and <br />c. not allow an area of land used to qualify a tract for a dwelling based on an acreage standard to be <br />used to qualify another tract for a dwelling if the land use approval would be based on an acreage <br />standard. <br /> <br />No dwellings will be located on a different lot or parcel as a result of this proposal. The criterion does not <br />apply. <br />