PLA25-037 Staff Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

b. Where fire apparatus access roads serve not more than two one- or two-family dwellings, Group R- 3 or Group U occupancies, OFC section 503.1 permits this road to be modified. However, the drivable road surface may not be less than 12 feet wide and be located within a 20 foot wide unobstructed easement. TFD’s current assessment of the existing roadway indicates there may be obstructions (trees, etc.) and insufficient improved surface and easement width along side River Bend Materials property, through the adjacent property (Smith) and through this property (4741) which may create delays when responding to emergencies. c. This roadway will need to be assessed to ensure it meets the requirements for fire apparatus access. If needed, corrections will be required prior to receiving an approval from Turner Fire District. 2. If additional structures are proposed at any time in the future, fire protection water supplies shall be in accordance with OFC section 507. 3. If additional structures are proposed at any time in the future, premises identification shall be in accordance with OFC section 505. 4. If additional structures are proposed at any time in the future, access to building openings and roofs shall be in accordance with OFC section 504. 5. If additional structures are proposed at any time in the future or security gates are proposed at any time in the future, security gates shall be in accordance with OFC 503.6 and key boxes shall be in accordance with OFC section 506. Applicants are encouraged to contact Turner Fire District if they have questions. Marion County Surveyor’s Office commented: 1. No survey required for properties greater than ten acres per ORS 92.060 (8). 2. Property line adjustment deed(s) shall be recorded with the Marion County Clerk’s Office. Per ORS 92.190 (4). Marion County Assessor’s Office provided information regarding taxes on the subject properties. All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. 7. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an SA zone are listed in Chapter 17.137.090(C) MCC. These criteria are as follows: 1. When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the minimum parcel size pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the same number of lots or parcels shall be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than the minimum parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not apply to those lots or parcels. The minimum parcel size listed in MCC 17.137.090(A)(1) for SA parcels is 80 acres. Both parcels are under this threshold, therefore, this section does not apply. 2. If the minimum parcel size in subsection (A)(1) of this section is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. The minimum parcel size is not larger than 80 acres; both parcels are under the minimum parcel size. Therefore, this section does not apply. 3. Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment.