Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5. The applicants are proposing to adjust the property lines on two parcels of land that Staff has determined to be 3.34- <br />acre parcel of land and 6.25-acre parcel of land to create a 2.6-acre parcel of land and a 6.99-acre parcel of land. <br />The purpose of this adjustment is to provide more area for the existing homesite on tax lot 1200 to pasture the <br />owner’s horses and to better care for the land. <br /> <br />6. Various agencies were contacted about the proposal and given an opportunity to comment. <br /> <br />Marion County Surveyor’s Office commented: <br /> <br />1) Properties 10 acres or less must be surveyed per ORS 92.060 (7) and the survey submitted for review. <br />2) Survey checking fee required at the time of review. <br />3) Property line adjustment deeds shall be recorded with the Marion County Clerk’s Office. Per ORS 92.190 (4). <br /> <br />Marion County Land Development Engineering and Permits (LDEP): Commented that they are concerned that the <br />lot being reduced not become landlocked and expressed preference that the reduced lot be a flag lot with access to <br />Old Mehama RD SE. <br /> <br />ENGINEERING ADVISORY <br /> <br />A. Consider reconfiguring the smaller parcel with a 20-foot wide flag portion to Old Mehama Road or <br />granting an access and utility easement over the larger parcel. <br /> <br />Marion County Building commented: “No Building Inspection concerns. It is recommended new property lines be <br />established at least 3 feet from existing residential structures for fire separation purposes.” <br /> <br />Marion County Assessor’s Office provided information regarding taxes on the subject properties. <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. <br /> <br />7. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an EFU zone are listed in Chapter 17.136.090(C) MCC. These <br />criteria are as follows: <br /> <br />1. When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the <br />minimum parcel size pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the same number of lots or parcels shall <br />be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to <br />the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be <br />reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than the minimum <br />parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not <br />apply to those lots or parcels. <br /> <br />Neither of the parcels involved in the proposal are larger than the minimum parcel size, nor will either parcel be <br />brought above the minimum parcel size. The criterion does not apply. <br /> <br />2. If the minimum parcel size in subsection (A)(1) of this section is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel <br />subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the <br />lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. <br /> <br />Neither of the parcels involved in the proposal are over the minimum parcel size to start, therefore the criterion does <br />not apply. <br /> <br />3. Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable <br />for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. <br /> <br />Of the two parcels involved in the proposal, one (tax lot 1200) currently has a dwelling, several accessory structures, <br />a corral, and land that is currently utilized for agriculture purposes. The applicants are proposing to transfer <br />approximately 0.74-acres of the underutilized land (tax lot 1300) to the residential property to provide additional <br />space the occupants’ horses. The remainder of tax lot 1300 will become a flag lot with a connection to Old Mehama <br />RD SE and remain part of the larger tract of land owned by the Kimsey family. The adjusted property line will