Laserfiche WebLink
<br />6. The applicants should contact the Stayton Fire District to obtain a copy of the District’s Recommended Building <br />Access and Premise Identification regulations and the Marion County Fire Code Applications Guide. Fire District <br />access standards may be more restrictive than County standards. <br /> <br />APPEAL PROCEDURE: The Marion County Zone Code provides that certain applications be considered first by the <br />County Planning Director. If there is any doubt that the application conforms with adopted land use policies and regulations <br />the Director must condition or deny the application. Anyone who disagrees with the Director's decision may request that <br />the application be considered by a Marion County hearings officer after a public hearing. The applicant may also request <br />reconsideration (one time only and a fee of $200) on the basis of new information subject to signing an extension of the <br />150-day time limit for review of zoning applications. <br /> <br />A public hearing is held on appeals subject to the appellant paying a $250.00 fee. Requests for reconsideration, or consider- <br />ation by a hearings officer, must be in writing (form available from the Planning Division) and received in the Marion <br />County Planning Division, 5155 Silverton Road NE, Salem, by 5:00 p.m. on June 13th, 2025. If you have questions about <br />this decision contact the Planning Division at (503) 588-5038 or at the office. This decision is effective June 16th, 2025 <br />unless further consideration is requested. <br /> <br />FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Findings and conclusions on which decision was based are noted below. <br /> <br />1. The subject property is designated Primary Agriculture in the Marion County Comprehensive Plan and <br />correspondingly zoned EFU (Exclusive Farming Use).The purpose of the EFU zone is to provide areas for continued <br />practice of commercial agriculture. These areas are generally well suited for large-scale farming. The EFU zone is <br />also intended to allow other uses that are compatible with agricultural activities, to protect forests, scenic resources <br />and fish and wildlife habitat, and to maintain and improve the quality of air, water and land resources of the county. <br /> <br />2. The properties are located on the south side of Old Mehama Road SE approximately one quarter of a mile east of <br />its intersection with Silbernagel Road SE. Tax lot 1200 contains a 1947 dwelling, several accessory structures, a <br />corral, and land that is being cultivated. This lot (tax lot 1200) was created in its current configuration as part of a <br />Lot Line Adjustment case in 1988 (LLA88-005). The results are shown on Survey 31289 from 1988. Therefore, tax <br />lot 1200 is legal for land use purposes. <br /> <br /> Staff could not find a deed that accurately matches tax lot 1300 in its current configuration, however, tax lot 1300 <br />is shown on a 1988 survey in its current configuration and acreage (Survey 31289). The Kimsey family has owned <br />land around this area since at least 1941, and the deeds have changed over the years via sales of parcels and at least <br />one property line adjustment. In addition, the property lines have been adjusted to account for Old Mehama Rd SE. <br />Several of these older deeds described the road as part of the land in the perimeter descriptions. No records could <br />be found that indicate that tax lot 1300 had a dwelling. Staff concluded that tax lot 1300 was inadvertently created <br />in its current configuration through LLA88-005 and was surveyed in 1988 as part of land use case LLA88-005. <br />Staff has found that after LLA88-005 was approved - the applicants did not dissolve the property lines/tax accounts <br />or record new perimeter description deeds leading to the confusion as to what was created and when. <br /> <br />In summation, Staff concluded that tax lots 1000, 1100, 1400, and 1600 are one parcel of land and that tax lots <br />1200 and 1300 are another separate parcel of land and Staff is proposing a modified property line adjustment. In <br />order to address this issue and get the applicants the desired property lines, Staff is recommending a modified <br />application: <br /> <br /> Application of Warren & Nancy Kimsey and Tina & Michael Carr for a MODIFIED property line <br />adjustment to adjust the property lines on a 3.34-acre parcel and a 6.25-acre parcel to create a 2.6-acre <br />parcel and 6.99-acre parcel in an EFU (Exclusive Farm Use) zone located at 17544 Old Mehama Rd SE, <br />Stayton (T9S; R1E; Section 9C; Tax lots 1000, 1100, 1200, 1300, 1400, 1600). <br /> <br />3. Surrounding uses consist of a power substation and commercial farm operations to the north on land zoned P <br />(Public) and EFU (Exclusive Farm Use). To the south and east the predominate use is commercial farming and <br />homes on larger acreage properties on land zoned EFU. To the west the uses are also on land zoned EFU in small <br />farm and acreage homesites. <br /> <br />4. Soil Survey for Marion County, Oregon, indicates approximately 98.5% of the soils on the subject tax lots are <br />classified as high value.