My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Permit - 1273069
Images9
>
Public Works - Permits
>
Building
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
COMPLETED FILES - INACTIVE
>
Road Names
>
Permit - 1273069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/14/2011 2:32:48 PM
Creation date
9/3/2003 10:49:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Permits
Permit Address
100 TUMBLE ST N
Permit City
Detroit
Parcel Number
105E01BC04400
Permit Type
Permit
Permit Site Number
11081
Permit Doc Type
Permit Document
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
"EXCEPTION: Unless otherwise required by the building <br />official, buildings or portions thereof which are <br />constructed in accordance with the conventional framing <br />requirements specified in Chapter 25 of this code shall <br />be deemed to meet the requirements of this section. <br /> <br />"(b) Rationality. Any system or method of construction to <br />be used shall admit of a rational analysis in accordance with <br />well-establlshed principles of mechanics." <br /> <br />These sections specify two concepts for the design of wood <br />construction. <br /> <br />A. The general case requires calculated systems using <br /> 2303(b) to resist loads references in Sec. 2303(a). <br />B. Section 2303(a) Exception, permits deviation from the <br /> general rule and allows the building official to <br /> authorize construction with minimum calculations using <br /> conventional framing requirements as specified in wood, <br /> Chapter 25. <br />C. A third alternative found in Section 107 allows the <br /> building official to test prototypes. If the prototype <br /> sustains the loads required by the code, others built <br /> to the same plan and specifications can be authorized. <br /> <br />Much construction is designed to "B" above. Truss designs are <br />not specified in the conventional f~amlng requirements and so <br />must be designed using either "A" or "C". Conventional framing <br />uses "rule of thumb" principles. Larger members are substituted <br />with large factors of safety in lieu of detailed analysis and <br />understanding of the way the building carries load. In contrast, <br />the general case requires rigorous analysis and understanding of <br />the way the building carries load. The amount of ~aterlal is <br />reduced and the safety factors are smaller. Trusses fall in the <br />design category. Materials are used sparingly and more sophisti- <br />cated principles of physics and mechanics are used to carry the <br />loads with special attention to connections. <br /> <br />Answer.tO Question 3: There are no specification truss designs <br />in the Structural Specialty Code. Trusses are designed using <br />engineering design principles and the allowable unit stresses for <br />the materials. For wood these are specified in Tables in Chapter <br />25 (see Sec. 2504 SSC). Connectors are specified in Section <br />2510. ~ach type of connector references one of the standards in <br />uniform Building Code standards. UBC Standards is a companion <br />document to the Uniform Building Code which is adopted at the <br />same time as the uniform Building Code and is part of the Oregon <br />Structural Specialty Code. <br /> <br />Standards, a building official cannot effectively regulate truss <br />const~uctioq., ............... (. ,) <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.