PLA25-004 Staff Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

the county, or by the city following annexation. A nonremonstrance agreement for future road or drainage improvements within the right-of-way abutting the lot may be required. The applicants are not proposing to develop any dwellings or create new dwelling lots. None of the parcels involved in the property line adjustment will be under 10 acres. The criteria do not apply. 2. The location of lot lines shall not significantly reduce feasible options for the future location of urban streets or utility services, or preclude development options on the property or adjacent properties. The proposed property line adjustment will result in a potentially landlocked Parcel II as the application does not show how access will be maintained. The application also does not show potential future plans for for internal roads or utility extensions or how connectivity would be maintained. The City of Woodburn recommended that the application be modified to adjust Parcels II, III, and IV; to adjust Parcel III and the portion of Parcel II in the Medium Density Residential zone to be one parcel. Then to adjust Parcel II to contain the remainder of Parcel II and establish a new eastern boarder at the Union Pacific Railroad tracks. Parcel IV would be adjusted to contain the current land and the portion of Parcel II east of the railroad tracks. Then Parcel I would remain as is. This adjustment will result in four parcels of approximately 45-acres, 13.1, acres, 10.17 acres, and 6.07 acres. Precise acreages and parcel boundaries shall be recorded in the new perimeter description deeds for each resultant newly configured parcel. This will meet the criterion. 3. When a lot occupied by a residence is reduced, or a lot is created to accommodate a new residence allowed in MCC 16.13.320, the lot should be as small as possible and should not be larger than one acre. If a lot of one acre or less is not feasible, the lot should either contain all of the undeveloped land or be large enough that the urban development potential will be a significant incentive for the owner to develop to planned urban uses when the lot is annexed. The configurations of the parcels are not for the purpose of isolating a dwelling, or related to accommodation of a new residence. The resulting lots being reduced or enlarged will still have significant incentive to redevelop at urban densities upon annexation. The criterion is met. 4. When a new or adjusted lot located in a residential plan designation is smaller than five acres and larger than one acre, a redevelopment plan shall be required demonstrating that the lot can accommodate future subdivision development at the median density proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. The zoning administrator shall review and approve the redevelopment plan. The redevelopment plan is only for the purposes of identifying a feasible means to subdivide the property and to identify an appropriate location for residences, and does not limit consideration of other development options when urban services are available. All resultant parcels and lots will be larger than 5 acres. The criterion does not apply. 5. New lots shall have no dimension less than 80 feet. The proposed adjusted properties will each have dimensions that surpass the 80-foot threshold. The criterion is met. 6. When a lot located in a residential plan designation and occupied by a nonresidential use is created or altered, the lot should include as little undeveloped land suitable for residential uses as possible, unless evidence is presented that undeveloped land needs to be included in the lot to accommodate allowable expansion of the subject use. None of the subject parcels are occupied by a known nonresidential use, and no new lots are being created. The criterion does not apply.