P25-002 Staff Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

6. After the final Partition plat has been recorded no alteration of property lines shall be permitted without first obtaining approval from the Planning Director. OTHER PERMITS, FEES, AND RESTRICTIONS: This approval does not remove or affect covenants or restrictions imposed on the subject property by deed or other instrument. The proposed use may require permits and/or fees from other local, State or Federal agencies. This decision does not take the place of, or relieve the responsibility for , obtaining other permits or satisfying restrictions or conditions. It is recommended that agencies mentioned in Finding #5 below be contacted to identify restrictions or necessary permits. The applicant is advised of the following: 7. Prior to recording the plat all taxes due must be paid to the Marion County Tax Department (contact the Marion County Tax Department at 503-588-5215 for verification of payments). 8. The applicants should contact Marion County Land Development Engineering and Permits (LDEP, 503-584- 7714) for additional Engineering Requirements and Advisories that may be required, as listed in Finding #5 below. APPEAL PROCEDURE: The Marion County Zone Code provides that certain applications be considered first by the County Planning Director. If there is any doubt that the application conforms with adopted land use policies and regula- tions the Director must condition or deny the application. Anyone who disagrees with the decision may request that the application be considered by a Marion County hearings officer after a public hearing. The applicant may also request reconsideration (one time only and a fee of $250) on the basis of new information subject to signing an extension of the 120-day time limit for review of zoning applications. A public hearing is held on appeals subject to the appellant paying a $250.00 fee. Requests for reconsideration, or consideration by a hearings officer, must be in writing (form available from the Planning Division) and received, together with the appeal fee, in the Marion County Planning Division, 5155 Silverton Rd. NE, Salem by 5:00 p.m. on March 5th, 2025. If you have questions about this decision contact the Planning Division at (503) 588-5038 or at the office. This decision is effective March 6th, 2025, unless further consideration is requested. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Findings and conclusions on which the decision was based are noted below. l. The property is designated Residential in the City of Stayton Comprehensive Plan. The major purpose of this designation and the corresponding UT-20 (Urban Transition) zone is to provide areas for future residential development. 2. The property is located on the east side of Golf Club Road SE, approximately 0.8 mile south of the intersection of Golf Club Rd SE and N Santiam Highway (Hwy 22). The property is approximately 19.43-acres and approximately 2.75-acres are developed with a single-family 1930 dwelling and related accessory structures. The property has been described in its current configuration since at least 1965. The property is located within the City of Stayton’s UGB (Urban Growth Boundary). In 2004 a partition case (P04-047) was approved on the subject parcel, and it was found to be legal for land use purposes. 3. Adjacent properties surrounding the subject parcel are also in the UT-20 zone within the City of Stayton’s UGB. Properties further south are in the City of Stayton. Properties further to the west are UT-20 within the City of Stayton’s UGB and beyond that the main zoning is Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) in Marion County. 4. The applicant proposes to divide a 19.43-acre parcel into two parcels consisting of 2.68-acres and 16.85-acres. 5. Land Development Engineering and Permits (LDEP) commented: ENGINEERING CONDITIONS Condition A – On the partition plat dedicate a 50-foot R/W half-width over the Golf Club Road subject property frontage to meet the City of Stayton Minor Arterial standard [MCC16.27.210(E)(7) & 16.33.260]. Condition B – Prior to partition plat approval, record a non-remonstrance agreement as to non-objection and financial responsibility attached to the larger rear shadow parcel for deferred future Golf Club Road frontage improvements meeting City of Stayton Minor Arterial design standards to include the proposed frontage parcel at the time the rear shadow parcel is annexed and developed into a city subdivision so that sufficient traffic safety and pedestrian connectivity measures such as road widening, turn lane, re-graded shoulder or