CU25-007 Staff Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

E. DEQ has jurisdiction through their NPDES 1200-C permitting program over construction stormwater erosion for 1.0 acre or more of ground disturbance. Oregon Department of Aviation (ODAV) commented: 1. In accordance with FAR Part 77.9 and OAR 738-070-0060, the proposed development is required to undergo aeronautical evaluations by the FAA and ODAV. The applicant can use the FAA’s Notice Criteria Tool to determine which proposed structures warrant a notice of construction (including any cranes or other tall construction equipment). They are required to provide separate notices of construction to both the FAA and ODAV. The applicant should receive the resulting aeronautical determination letters from the FAA and ODAV prior to approval of any building permits. 2. The height of any new structures, trees, and other planted vegetation shall not penetrate FAR Part 77 Imaginary Surfaces, as determined by the FAA and ODAV. 3. Any proposed external lights shall be designed as to not interfere with aircraft or airport operations. 4. Any commercial aeronautical activities conducted from this property, including fuel sales, commercial hangar storage, aircraft maintenance, avionics sales, flight training, etc., all require the applicant to comply with ODAV’s Minimum Standards for the Aurora State Airport. 5. The Aurora State Airport is a designed for C-II aircraft, and has a 30,000 pound single wheel, and 45,000 pound dual wheel weight limitation. Any overweight aircraft operations require ODAV’s authorization and a signed waiver. 6. ODAV is currently in the middle of creating a new master plan for the Aurora State Airport. Depending on the final outcomes of the planning efforts, the new master plan may affect the proposed development, and could include improvements on state property that could affect the proposed uses/development. Marion County Building Inspection commented: Permit(s) are required to be obtained prior to development of structures and/or utilities installation on private property. All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. 6. Conditional use applications in the rural zones require compliance with MCC 17.119.070. 17.119.070 Findings of the director, planning commission or hearings officer. Before granting a conditional use, the director, planning commission or hearings officer shall determine: A. That it has the power to grant the conditional use; The Planning Director has the power to grant conditional uses in the Public zone that comply with MCC 17.171.040. The criterion is met. B. That such conditional use, as described by the applicant, will be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the zone; Airport and airport-related commercial and industrial uses are a conditional use within the P zone as per MCC 17.171.030(A). “When authorized under the procedure provided for conditional uses in this title, the following uses will be permitted in a P zone: A. Airport and airport-related commercial and industrial uses;” Airport-related uses located at the Aurora Airport are not subject to the size limitations in MCC 17.171.040 (A & B) as be MCC 17.171.040 (C). Currently there is one structure on the subject parcel. The applicant has discussed the possibility or removing this structure entirely, or adding on to it to construct one of the new proposed hangers. For the purpose of this application we consider the project with the existing structure intact. The criterion is met.