Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> <br /> 2 <br /> <br /> 4 <br /> <br /> 5 <br /> <br /> 6 <br /> <br /> 7 <br /> <br /> 8 <br /> <br /> 9 <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br /> 13 <br /> 14 <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br /> ~7 <br /> 15 <br /> ~9 <br /> 2O <br /> <br /> g6 <br />Page <br /> <br />until April 1, 1988, at 5:00 p.m. for clarzfication of the <br />applicants' intent if different fuom the Hearings Officer's <br />interpretation. <br /> <br /> The appellants in this case are Norman and Doris Evans, <br />Lonny and Rose Smith, Richard and Laura Adair, Robert and Eilecn <br />Mickey, and Larry and Paulette Klein. <br /> <br />IV. Findings of Fact <br /> <br /> The Hearings Officer, after careful consideration of' the <br />testimony and evidence in the record, issues the following <br />findings of fact: <br /> <br />The property is designated Primary Agriculture in the <br />Marion County Comprehensive Plan and is zoned EFU. <br />Agricultural uses are permitted in this zone. The <br />southern half of the subject property ~s within the <br />identified 100 year Floodplain of Mill Creek. <br /> <br />The property is located on the south side of' Mill Creek <br />Road approximately 600 feet west of its intersect:ion <br />with Leverman Road. The subject propemty contains a <br />dwel]J, ng, shop and mobile home. <br /> <br />Surrounding uses consist of' sma] ] farm and acrcuge <br />homesites to the north on land zoned SA (SpecJ. a] <br />Agriculture> and to the east, west and south on <br />zoned EFU. <br /> <br />The Soil Conservation 5er'vice h{~s ident'ified Class <br />and IV $oJ.] $ on the proper'ty, <br /> <br />The fist ponds are proposed to be placed within t.}~(., <br />iderxtified f]oodplairl ar'e¢~ orx Llue property. !')eve]epmo~%t <br />of this kind in a ftoodp:lai n req~.tJ res approval of a <br />Floodplain Development permit to ensure compliance witN <br />the Flood Ppot:ect.:ion Sl:end<~r'ds of Section ] '/75-(}60 ef t}'Rt <br />Marion County Zoning OpdJnance. <br /> <br />V. Additional. Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law <br /> <br />The additional fish ponds are a permitted use and t:he <br />increase in production, up to 32 rs_aping ponds, would be <br />enough to classJfy t,h'i.s Operation as a commercial far'm. <br /> <br />2. The criteria which is r'elevant to this application is <br /> MCZO 278.060. <br /> <br />The issues on appeal deal with the conflicts between the <br />permitted commercial farm operations on EFU land and the <br /> <br />CU/FP 88-8/ORDER - 2 <br /> <br /> <br />