Staff Recommendation - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3 (c) “Owner”, as the term is used in this section only, includes the wife, husband, son, daughter, mother, father, brother, brother-in-law, sister, sister-in-law, son-in- law, daughter-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, stepparent, stepchild, grandparent, or grandchild of the owner or business entity owned by any one or combination of these family members. The property was purchased by Glen and Margie Morley in 1973. The property remained in their ownership until they passed away, Glen in 2019 and Margie in 2023. Their daughter Linda Morley is now the trustee for the estate. Therefore both (b) ad (c) of MCC 17.137.030(D)1 are satisfied and the criterion is met. (2) The tract on which the dwelling will be sited does not include a dwelling. The subject parcel does not contain a dwelling. The criterion is met. (3) The lot or parcel on which the dwelling will be sited was part of a tract on November 4, 1993, and no dwelling exists on another lot or parcel that was part of that tract. The subject parcel is contiguous with property in the same ownership, but zoned AR. Lot-of- record dwellings are not applicable to the AR zone. Therefore, for the purposes of this administrative review, the contiguously owned parcels are not considered a tract because they are not contiguously zoned. The criterion is met. (4) When the lot or parcel on which the dwelling will be sited is part of a tract, the remaining portions of the tract are consolidated into a single lot or parcel when the dwelling is allowed. This criterion will not apply because the subject parcel is not a part of a tract of SA zoned parcels. The contiguously owned AR zoned parcels are legal lots and not considered as a part of the 2,000-acre study. The criterion does not apply. (5) The request is not prohibited by, and complies with, the Comprehensive Plan and other provisions of this ordinance, including but not limited to floodplain, greenway, and big game habitat area restrictions. The subject property is not located within a floodplain, greenway, or big game habitat area. The subject property and proposed dwelling will comply with the provisions of the SA zone, which implement the standards of the Special Agriculture designation in the Marion County Comprehensive Plan. The criterion is met. (6) The proposed dwelling will not: (1) Exceed the facilities and service capabilities of the area. (2) Create conditions or circumstances contrary to the purpose of the Special Agriculture zone. The applicant recognizes that the proposed dwelling would rely upon a well and septic to provide water and sewer services. This will require permitting though Marion County Septic and the