Laserfiche WebLink
The parcel was created by partition (MJP78-078) in 1978 to legitimize the description of the property as <br />conveyed in a deed recorded earlier the same year on Reel I I I Page 1041 of the Marion County Book of <br />Land Records and has existed in this configuration ever since then. The property does not contain a <br />dwelling. The criterion is met. <br />3. The dwelling will not materially alter the stability of the overall land use pattern of the area. In making <br />this determination the cumulative impact ofpossible new non faun dwellings on other lots or parcels in <br />the area similarly situated shall be considered. To address this standard, the following information shall <br />be provided: <br />(a) Identify a study area for the cumulative impact analysis. The study area shall include at least 2, 000 <br />acres or a smaller area not less than 1, 000 acres, if the smaller area is a distinct agricultural area <br />based on topography, soil types, land use pattern, or the type offarm or ranch operations or <br />practices that distinguish it front other, adjacent agricultural areas. Findings shall describe the study <br />area, its boundaries, the location of the subject parcel within this area, tivhy the selected area is <br />representative of the land use pattern surrounding the subject parcel and is adequate to conduct the <br />analysis required by this standard. Lands zoned for rural residential or other urban or non -resource <br />uses shall not be included in the study area; <br />The applicant provided a study area encompassing 2,000-acres of surrounding land. This study area <br />included only properties zoned for Farm Use. Lands zoned for rural residential or other non -resource uses <br />were excluded. Information supplied by the applicant, and verified by staff, indicates that there is no non - <br />resource zoned land applied to the study area and that the applicant's report meets the required area for <br />resource zone analysis. <br />The applicant has indicated this study area is representative of the land use pattern surrounding the subject <br />parcel. Uses within the study area include rural residences, timber lots, natural woods, Christmas tree lots, <br />and fields of row crops. Staff concludes that the area presented by the applicant is a fair representation of <br />the surrounding area and is sufficient to arrive at a sampling of the land use pattern. <br />(b) Identify iidthin the study area the broad types offarm uses (irrigated or non -irrigated crops, pasture <br />or grazing lands), the number, location and type of existing dii ellings (faun, non farm, hardship, <br />etc), and the dia�elling development trends since 1993. Determine the potential number of non farm <br />dwellings that could be approved under MCC 17.136 050(A), including identification ofpredominant <br />soil classifications and parcels created prior to January 1, 1993. The findings shall describe the <br />existing land use pattern of the study area including the distribution and arrangement of existing uses <br />and the land use pattern that could result from approval of the possible non faun dwellings under this <br />provision; <br />The subject parcel is within an area near the edge of the City of Salem UGB, an area which contains <br />several large tracts of Acreage Residential zoned parcels. As a result, the 2,000-acre study area creates a <br />meandering shape that wraps around these tracts and extends around and above peninsulas of residential - <br />neighborhoods. The largest contiguous space of the study area exists in the southern half. <br />The applicant noted that due to the steep slopes and low value soil, most of the parcels included in the <br />2,000-acre study area have woodlots and are not in agricultural use. Based on Marion County aerial <br />photographs of the region, very few of the woodlots appear to be intentionally planted stands of timber. <br />One of the stands is directly north adjacent to the subject parcel. South adjacent is a clearcut that occurred <br />between 2021 and 2023. Southwest adjacent of the subject parcel was a clear cut from between 2016- <br />2019 that has been replanted. It is unclear from aerial photographs if this parcel has been replanted with <br />timber or with Christmas trees. Roughly half of the wooded areas within the study area are covered with <br />deciduous trees and irregularly growing evergreen trees. These naturally wooded areas are not considered <br />to be in timber use. The largest stands of timber range from 10-15 acres and are on properties that contain <br />dwellings. <br />