Laserfiche WebLink
would be served by a private roadway system onto Enchanted Way SE through the existing <br />paved road system. Regardless of where the parcels access public roads, traffic use generated <br />would be fairly minimal. Applicant does not propose changing the functional classification <br />of any road or standards implementing them. Goal 12 is met. <br />Goal 13: Energy Conservation. Nortnal residential use will not significantly impact energy <br />consumption. Goal 13 is satisfied. <br />Goal 14: Urbanization. An exception has been proved here by a preponderance of the <br />evidence and as set forth in these findings. Goal 14 is excepted to, and no longer applicable. <br />Goals 15-19, Willamette River Greenway, Estuarine Resources, Coastal Shorelands, Beaches <br />and Dunes, and Ocean Resources. The subject Property is not within the Willamette River <br />Greenway, or near any ocean or coastal -related resources. These goals do not apply. <br />Proposals to amend the comprehensive plan must be consistent with the Statewide Planning Goals. The <br />Applicants address the Goals, and the exceptions to Goals 3 and 14 is justified as submitted. <br />COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br />27. All Comprehensive Plan changes are subject to review by DLCD. The DLCD was notified as <br />required by State Law and did not comment prior to this report being prepared. <br />28. The Marion County Comprehensive Plan (MCCP) establishes procedures to be used when <br />considering plan amendments. Plan changes directly involving 5 or fewer properties will be <br />considered a quasi-judicial amendment. The amendment will be reviewed by the zone change <br />procedures established in MCC 17.123. A plan amendment of this type may be processed <br />simultaneously with a zone change request with the zone change procedure outlined in Chapter <br />123 of the MCRZO. The Property is comprised of one parcel of land and the proposal can <br />therefore be considered under the quasi-judicial amendment process. <br />29. The proposal must be consistent with applicable polices for Rural Residential development <br />contained in the comprehensive plan. These policies include: <br />8. Since there is a limited amount of area designated Rural Residential efficient use of these <br />areas shall be encouraged. The minimum lot size in Rural Residential areas existing on <br />October 4, 2000. shall not be less than 2 acres allowing for a range of parcel sizes from 2 <br />to 10 acres in size unless environmental limitations require a larger parcel. Areas rezoned <br />to an Acreage Residential zone after October 4, 2000, shall have a 10 acre minimum lot size <br />unless an exception to Goal 14 (Urbanization) is granted. <br />The Applicant is proposing to rezone a portion of the subject parcel to an Acreage <br />Residential zone with a two -acre minimum lot size. The requirements for an exception to <br />Goal 14-are addressed above and the criteria were satisfied. <br />9. When approving rural subdivisions and partitioning each parcel shall be approved as a <br />dwelling site only if it is determined that the site: 1) has the capacity to dispose of <br />wastewater; 2) is free from natural hazards or the hazard can be adequately corrected; 3) <br />there is no significant evidence of inability to obtain a suitable domestic water supply; and <br />Exhibit A - Findings Case No. CP/ZC 21-005 21 <br />4864-0600-7078, v. 3 <br />