STAFF DECISION (3459) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

(b) The location of lot lines shall not significantly reduce feasible options for the future location of urban streets or utility services, or preclude development options on the property or adjacent properties. (c) When a lot is occupied by a residence is reduced, or a lot is created to accommodate a new residence allowed in Section 13.32, the lot should be as small as possible and should not be larger than 1 acre. If a lot of 1 acre or less is not feasible the lot should either contain all of the undeveloped land or be large enough that the urban development potential will be a significant incentive for the owner to develop to planned urban uses when the lot is annexed. (d) When a new or adjusted lot located in a residential plan designation is smaller than 5 acres and larger than 1 acre a redevelopment plan shall be required demonstrating that the lot can accommodate future subdivision development at the median density proposed in the Comprehensive Plan. (e) When a lot located in a residential plan designation and occupied by a non-residential use is created or altered, the lot should include as little undeveloped land suitable for residential uses as possible, unless evidence is presented that undeveloped land needs to be included in the lot to accommodate allowable expansion of the use. 7. At this time, no additional right-of-way dedication was requested by Public Works. Both resulting parcels will be less than one acre in size. The area that would be transferred already has a structure on it and the reconfiguration would not affect future development potential. The standards in 6(a) and (b) are met. 8. The parcel that will be reduced in size does not have a dwelling on it and both resulting parcels will be less than an acre in size. The parcel that does not currently support a dwelling will be reduced in size. Therefore, the applicant’s proposal will comply with the criteria listed in 6 (c), (d), and (e). 9. Based on the above discussion, the applicants’ proposal meets the criteria for a property line adjustment APPROVED. in a UT-5 zone. The property line adjustment request is, therefore, Sterling Anderson Date: July 17, 2009 Director-Planning Division If you have any questions please contact Lisa Milliman at (503) 588-5038.