Laserfiche WebLink
residence appears to be on a well. Any existing unused wells shall be abandoned to meet <br />the requirements of the Oregon State Board of water Resources. <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to respond, or stated no objection to the proposal, at the <br />time this report was written. <br />6. The following regulations apply when lot line adjustments and/or partitioning of land are <br />proposed: <br />(a) Lot Area: The minimum lot area for a single family dwelling in a subdivision <br />approved after the effective date of the Ordinance, or a mobile home on a mobile <br />home subdivision lot approved after the effective date of this ordinance, is 4, 000 <br />square feet when located within the Salem/Keizer Area Urban Growth Boundary. <br />In all other cases lots shall be a minimum of 6, 000 square feet. (See Chapter 27 <br />for density limitations). <br />(b) Lot dimensions, single family: Except as provided in Section 26.800 for Planned <br />Developments, the average width of a lot shall be at least 60 feet; provided that <br />within the Salem/Keizer Urban Growth Boundary the average width of a lot shall <br />be at least 40 feet, and the average depth of a lot shall be at least 70 feet. <br />(c) Lot dimensions, other uses: The average width of a lot shall be at least 40 feet, <br />and the average depth of a lot shall be at least 80 feet, except as provided in <br />Section 26.800 for Planned Developments. <br />7. As noted previously, the subject parcel is zoned RS and within the Salem Area Urban <br />Growth Boundary. Therefore, all lots created through the partitioning process must be a <br />minimum of 6,000 square feet. The applicant proposes three new lots of 6,000 square <br />feet or larger. The proposal complies with the standards listed in 6 (a). <br />8. The average width of a lot shall be at least 40 feet, and the average depth of a lot shall be <br />at least 70 feet. The lot configurations shown on the tentative partition plan submitted by <br />the applicants appears to this satisfy criterion, which can be made a condition of <br />approval. The proposal complies with the standards listed in 6 (b). <br />9. Paxton Way NE, was chosen as the new road name for the easement on the western <br />portion of the property. However, Marion County Land Development Engineering & <br />Permits is requesting that the western easement be combined with an existing easement, <br />Tree Lane SE. If the easements are combined then a new road name is not needed. <br />8. Based on the above and subject to the required conditions, the proposed partitioning <br />complies with the criteria for a partitioning in the RS zone and is, therefore, <br />APPROVED. <br />Sterling Anderson Date: 2/14/08 <br />Director -Planning Division <br />If you have any questions please contact Diane Rolph at (503) 588-5038. <br />