Laserfiche WebLink
Marion County Ordinance 1209, Section 8.1(d) is not satisfied. <br /> <br />(e) The application for compensation was timely filed. <br /> <br />Under the provisions of Measure 37 applicants have two years from the date of a denial or the <br />effective date of the Measure to file a claim. The claim was timely filed on November 7, 2006. <br /> <br />Marion County Ordinance 1209, Section 8.1 (e) is satisfied. <br /> <br />(f) The applicant is the current owner. <br /> <br />Marion County deed records (Reel 25; Page 1382) indicate that James and Sandra Reed acquired <br />title to the property on September 4, 1975, when it was deeded to them by Frances Kremer. The <br />applicants are the current owners and have had a continuous ownership interest in the property since <br />September 4, 1975. <br /> <br />Marion County Ordinance 1209, Section 8.1(f) is satisfied. <br /> <br /> (g) The County is the entity responsible for payment, not some other agency that enacted the <br />challenged regulation. <br /> <br />The property is outside any city limits and regulated by the Marion County Rural Zoning Ordinance. <br /> The denial in the zoning verification letter was based on the use being inconsistent with the goals of <br />the Marion County Comprehensive Plan and the intent of the EFU zone. As these regulations were <br />enacted by Marion County the County is the responsible entity. <br /> <br />Marion County Ordinance 1209, Section 8.1(g) is satisfied. <br /> <br />CONCLUSION <br /> <br />12. The Planning Division has concluded that the applicant’s claim may be able to meet all of the <br />necessary criteria if evidence is submitted on the exact amount of diminution in value attributed <br />to Marion County land use regulations. For compensation purposes ownership dates back to <br />September 4, 1975, when the property was zoned RA and the proposed use was permitted. <br /> <br />13. Under Section 10.3(b) of Ordinance 1209 if the claim is approved, in lieu of payment, the Marion <br />County Board of Commissioners may remove, modify, or not apply the regulation. If the Board <br />chooses to waive regulations the waiver date is also September 4, 1975. In order to establish a <br />dwelling on the property under the current EFU zone the Board would have to waive the following <br />regulations: MCRZO sections 136.010, 136.030 (a), 136.050 (a) (except 136.070), 136.060 (a) and <br />(b), 136.090 (a) and (b) except (b) (4), 172.36 and MCCP Agricultural Lands Policies 2, 3, 4, 5, and <br />9. <br /> <br />14. The EFU zone is regulated by Oregon Revised Statute 215.283 and Oregon Administrative Rule <br />660-033. The applicants are advised that a waiver from the State of Oregon for the same use is also <br />required before the use can be allowed. <br /> <br /> <br />