DECISION (36) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 261 Page Allowing large,commercial signing is not consistent with retaining the residential character of neighborhoods. 5.. There. is no evidence the sign placed so that it would not block vision clearance in the intersection area, would be detrimental to the public welfare or persons or property in the area. 6. The substantial property rights, of the petitioner go to the primary use of the subject property which is resi- dential. Therefore, a variance of the sign requirement ,is not necessary for preservation and enjoyment of these rights. The applicant has failed to meet th'e burden of proof to vary the size requirements of the permitted sign under MCZO 191.030(h). VI. Order It is herebv found that the applicants' have failed to meet the burden of proving the relevant standards and criteria for a variance to the sign 'size requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, and therefore, it is ordered that the request for a Variance be DENIED. It is further found that applicants have met the burden of proving the relevant standards and criteria for a conditional use home -occupation, and therefore, a Conditional Use permit is hereby GRANTED, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain all permits required by the Marion County Building Inspection Division. 2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Uniform Fire Code as requested by Marion County Fire District #1. 3. The conditional use permit approved herein is valid for a period of one year from the effective date of this Order, unless a request for extension is made in writing to the Planning Division prior to the expiration of the permit. 4. The use shall be -limited to one sign, one square foot in size. 5. The requirements of MCZO 120.075,' as outlined herein shall be met. V/CU 88-2/ORDER - 5 Z = o� 21 Z C13 N N 05 '� 22 � a m Y � d O o 23 EU, W ov d mC:.2 ; d F 24 a24 � 25 261 Page Allowing large,commercial signing is not consistent with retaining the residential character of neighborhoods. 5.. There. is no evidence the sign placed so that it would not block vision clearance in the intersection area, would be detrimental to the public welfare or persons or property in the area. 6. The substantial property rights, of the petitioner go to the primary use of the subject property which is resi- dential. Therefore, a variance of the sign requirement ,is not necessary for preservation and enjoyment of these rights. The applicant has failed to meet th'e burden of proof to vary the size requirements of the permitted sign under MCZO 191.030(h). VI. Order It is herebv found that the applicants' have failed to meet the burden of proving the relevant standards and criteria for a variance to the sign 'size requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, and therefore, it is ordered that the request for a Variance be DENIED. It is further found that applicants have met the burden of proving the relevant standards and criteria for a conditional use home -occupation, and therefore, a Conditional Use permit is hereby GRANTED, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant shall obtain all permits required by the Marion County Building Inspection Division. 2. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Uniform Fire Code as requested by Marion County Fire District #1. 3. The conditional use permit approved herein is valid for a period of one year from the effective date of this Order, unless a request for extension is made in writing to the Planning Division prior to the expiration of the permit. 4. The use shall be -limited to one sign, one square foot in size. 5. The requirements of MCZO 120.075,' as outlined herein shall be met. V/CU 88-2/ORDER - 5