Laserfiche WebLink
Dan Berrey <br />April 4, 1997 <br />Page 4 <br />1997. Because the County is requiring vacation of the 547 Court <br />Street property on or before April 21, 1997, in order to stay on <br />its schedule for abatement and demolition, the firm is vacating the <br />premises by that date and prior to the completion of the 12th <br />Street building as a direct result of demolition for the Courthouse <br />Square project. Therefore, VanderMay & Doyle meets the definition <br />of displaced person set forth in 49 C.F.R. sec. 24.2(g)(1)(ii). <br />If you need any additional information in order to assess <br />VanderMay & Doyle's eligibility for relocation benefits, please let <br />me know. <br />On a final note, because at the time that the moving estimates <br />were prepared we did not know whether the County would require the <br />inclusion of subtenant claims in the VanderMay & Doyle benefit <br />application, we asked the estimators to include in their bids a <br />separate amount for the moving of Ms. Guthrie's goods to her new <br />space. Since as I understand it you are working directly with Ms. <br />Guthrie, we have not included that portion of the bids which <br />concern Ms. Guthrie's goods in the attached moving expense claim. <br />Please feel free to contact me (either directly if Mr. Hanna <br />consents or through Mr. Hanna's office) if you have any questions <br />concerning this application or if you need any additional <br />information. <br />Thank you very much for your attention to this matter. <br />Sincerely yours, <br />~ mCU.~,~~ ~ ~ ,~ ; <br />ahc~Q~, <br />Maureen Callahan VanderMay ~~ <br />Attorney and Counselor at Law <br />MCV : j p <br />cc: Monty VanderMay <br />Daniel Doyle <br />File <br />