My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Financial- Salem, City of (Streetscape)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Financial- Salem, City of (Streetscape)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 3:34:12 PM
Creation date
9/7/2011 2:41:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10225
Title
Financial- Salem, City of (Streetscape)
Company
Marion County
BLDG Date
12/24/1997
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Finance
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From this comparison the Pence/Kelly bid exceeds 120% o( the median bid price by $247,883. <br />Two of the five bid elements, General and Streetscape, are primarily responsible for this high <br />bid value. The combined totat of these two elements as bid by Pence/Keily is $934,688, an <br />amount which exceeds the 120% median of ail bidders for these two elements by $270,334. <br />The General item which includes mobilization, bonds, permifs. and tra(fic cont~ol is 504% of the <br />median of all bidders. This excessive bid amount may suggest that the bidder did not <br />understand or the bid documents were not sufficiently clear in designalion that this element is to <br />represent a cost for only the items oi Agency parlicipation. Our staff had previously requested <br />your architectural team to insure that this factor was clear to all prospective bidders. <br />With regard to bid alternate three, the Pence/Kelly bid is 166°/a of the median of all bids. This <br />bid amount of $270.347 exceeds 120% of inedian by $75,275. The apparent cause to lhis high <br />bid value is an excessive unit cost assigned to several of the 25 line items comprising the <br />streetscape element. <br />Bid alternatives two and eleven both ~elate to weather protection and are limited to a maximum <br />of $160 per lineal foot. These bid items are acceptable for Agency participation at $6,080 and <br />$53,760 respectively. <br />In summary, given execution of the participation agreement, the Agency will accept for the base <br />bid a maximum participation oi ~1,067,096 notwithstanding future change orders. This is <br />$247,883 less than amount bid for Agency funded elements, after adjustment for maximum <br />participation in weather protection. We request lhat the General and Streetscape elemenls be <br />reduced by an amount of $247,883. <br />Should you elect to award alternative three, the agency will accept a maximum participation of <br />$195,072. This is $75,275 less than the amount bid. We requesl that the Streetscape element <br />be reduced by this amount. <br />~w~ <br />Alternatives two and ttx~e as noted above are acceptable at a pa~licipation level of $6,080 and <br />$53,760 respectively should you elect to award these items. <br />We feel this level o( pa~ticipation is reasonable. The bid price tendered bY all other bidders for <br />elements of Agency participation is less than our offered level of participation. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~ ~~~S~ <br />Larry~VVacker <br />City Manager <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.