My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Demolition Documents (compiled notebook)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Demolition Documents (compiled notebook)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:11:05 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 1:43:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10319
Title
Demolition Documents (compiled notebook)
BLDG Date
8/28/1998
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Design - Planning
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
375
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. <br />,~ <br />~ <br />~(~ ~~~~U ND DISTRICT COURTS OF OREGON <br />THIRD JUDICIAL DISTRICT <br />L3tL 5 ~gg~ MARION COUNTY COURTHOUSE <br />P.O. BOX 12869 <br />SALEM, OREGON 97309-0869 <br />r~A~i~~r cou~,rY <br />~nMES H. MuRCr~D OF COMt~!iSS ~~dERS ~ ;. ' ~; ;`~ ~. <br />Court Administrator 4~r ~ ~ <br />(503)588-5368 <br />~.~ ~ j'~y! <br />December 4, 1997 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />TO: Members, Board of <br />FROM: James H. M <br />SUBJECT: Court Facilities <br />''.:;~~ GCUNTY CO~RECTIO^,i.: <br />E ~~ ~, n~~ ~ t,_n <br />HAIR AN <br />i <br />~ ' • - <br />, <br />,~' ,~ i~l ~ ~,~ <br />We spoke recently about the continuing need of the Oregon Court system for <br />adequate facilities for courts here in Marion County. I indicated that I would review our <br />situation and provide you with an update. <br />As Judge Lipscomb has recently stated, the Marion County Courts have grown to <br />12 judicial positions over the past several years, with a 13th position to be filled as of January <br />1999. In addition, we have five judicial hearing officers, for a total of 18 judicial and judieial <br />officers within the next 13 months. <br />Further, we had developed the workload justification in 1996 for three new <br />judgeships, but for other reasons (including fac~lities limitations) requested only two such <br />positions be created. The 1997 Legislature in fact created only one of these judgeships at this <br />time. We fully expect to again approach the Legislature seeking additional judicial positions in <br />the next session. <br />The Court system, however, is more than judges. We concluded the last biennium <br />with 100 FTE. In October of this year, we hired five additional staff, and will be increasing by <br />five more around the first of 1999, along with the new judgeship. <br />Facility needs of the Court are more than chambers and courtrooms. Staff offices <br />~ <br />and program space are also serious issues. As you may recall, we have a jury assembly room on <br />the second floor which comfortably accommodates around 40 or 50 individuals. We regularly <br />surnmon panels of around 150-175 jurors. Present space is obviously woefully inadequate for <br />panels of this size; it is even ridiculously worse for significant trials where even larger jury <br />panels are required. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.