My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Courthouse Square Internal Staff Team Minutes
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Courthouse Square Internal Staff Team Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:51:43 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 11:10:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10321
Title
Courthouse Square Internal Staff Team Minutes
Company
Marion County
BLDG Date
6/5/1998
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
258
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
This package will get put together as quickly as possible to submit to SPOC so they can set up their <br />next meeting schedule. <br />~/ 2. Remediation URdate <br />David Hartwig reported that he has not received the final report for pre-construction remediation <br />activities for the site with the exception of Chevron and Liu sites. Foss Environmental has not <br />provided necessary information to complete report. Steps have been taken to expedite receipt of <br />information to complete report. David has completed reading the draft for corrective action plan. <br />He will set up a meeting with the engineer, Billy Wasson and 7ohn Whittington to review this <br />material. If needed, Melvin Mazk can be consulted. <br />David will provide a copy of a letter from Tom Gainer of Centurywest to bond counsel regarding <br />issues bond counsel raised about environmental issues and sale of bonds. This information will be <br />presented to bond counsel in their meeting this afternoon. <br />3. Melvin Mark Analysis of $1.60 <br />This item was covered during the update of the SPOC response earlier in the meeting. <br />4. Draft RFP <br />A draft copy of the RFP prepazed by Melvin Mark was distributed to staf£ Billy's intent is to send <br />~„ this draft copy along with a cover memo, sta.ting that there are areas of assumptions that need to be <br />defined by both boards before a final copy will be issued. Melvin Mark completed this draft based <br />on general assumptions made in eazlier staff development team meetings. It was recommended that <br />annotations be made in areas where policy decisions can be made and options are available. <br />Question regazding how parking was handled was asked by John Whittington. Melvin Mark was <br />working on creating a template everyone could work with. Wanted to leave this area open to let <br />developers be creative in the responses. Staff will review this draft. Billy and John will both <br />coordinate corrections/issues for each entity and jointly make recommendations to Craig. Another <br />draft could be ready by tomorrow afternoon. <br />Concern was raised over rushing through to get materials pulled together quickly. It was <br />recommended that if it takes a day or two longer to make sure everything is correct, let's take the <br />time to do this. <br />Marcia Kelly felt there are some policy issues that the boards need to address rather than staff, and <br />will work with Randy Franke to set up a time soon for both boards to discuss. <br />5. h r <br />John and Billy were asked to share the results of their conversation with the city staff on the parking <br />issues. The city's position is that there is not going to be a lot of city interest to helping unless <br />~ some parking was for the general public. Location of underground parking was not appealing to <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.