Laserfiche WebLink
, • , •. <br />not included. Discussions were held about what went into Dan's original budget numbers. <br />On the issue of parking, the cost per parking stall is now at $12,200 without consideration for <br />elevator on northwest corner and stairs. Originally we started with $11,000' with over 400 <br />stalls. The most efficient plan was at 423 spaces with a cost of $11,000 per stall. RG hasn't <br />upped his numbers to the $12,200 per stall yet. Impact on County costs could be close to <br />$500,000 in added parking costs. We need to revisit this issue and possibly looking at County's <br />policy of removing a11 contaminated soils. If DEQ does not require a clean site, let's leave the <br />remediation plan in place as long as environmental consultant buys off on this. <br />Discussions were held on how we arrived at 363 spaces at $11,000 per space. This is an <br />unknown. Pence Kelly will check back in their records to see where it comes from. Dave <br />working from numbers yesterday with 363 spaces without extra excavation, the cost would be <br />$11,750; to excavate the Chevron site: $12,460; to take out dirt to property line is $12,113; but it <br />gives you 377 stalls. Pence Kelly to go back and recheck numbers. We need to know how <br />these numbers have been generated. Randy and RG need the history. It is possvble the balance <br />of parking was factored into the $52 shell cost. We would like to focus on total cost of <br />building with architect & general contractor. RG and Randy will work with numbers on split <br />out between County and Transit. Dave will figure worst case and see where we end up. Other <br />factors have changed things and we cannot get back to the original 423 stalls at the lower cost <br />and the best efficiency rating. <br />What is Chevron status ? <br />David and Kathleen met before Ra.ndy came into meeting. There is addit~onal work by <br />Centurywest, but Ra.ndy not sure what it is at this time. County was told to have equipment <br />off site and we are controlling site. Kathleen is running model to calculate costs. May 2185 is the <br />date when we take control of site. Still working on negotiations and the ~ttomeys don't <br />anticipate any injunctions being filed as long as negotiations a.re going towards se~tttlement. <br />Where are we with the Statesman? No issues discussed. Kathleen is coming back in to deal <br />with this issue on the table for ne~rt week. <br />Meeting adjourned. <br />Page 6 of 6 <br />