Laserfiche WebLink
<br />than by assigning spaces. It could provide benefit for marketing of the retail/off ce space in the <br />~ building with 3/1,000 parking or actually having 4/1,000 to utilize. Melvin Mark has studies to <br />provide backup information on operating parking garages in this fashion and maximizing its <br />use. <br />On this method you would be looking at a worst case scenario of $600 / month. County is not <br />opposed to how it is enforced, but we would have to make changes in current County policy, <br />habits, etc. before we could commit to this approach. It would not be a simple process to make <br />the change. <br />Leonard and Dave had the opportunity to recheck the efficiency ratings for past designs. The <br />old scheme of 425+ stalls with the good efficiency rating, did not have a gpod circulation <br />pattern. Both designs (425-27 stalls) were based on 30' structural grid. The newest design <br />includes added storage rooms, maintenance equipment storage. Dave's esti~nate from last <br />week was based on the 377 stalls. There would be a$344,000 increase abo~e and beyond <br />digging and backfilling to add the 48-50 spaces to this plan. The price per stall at 365 <br />efficiency rating would be $11,721. The 377 stall plan is on the Chevron site. Dan Berrey <br />added that putting in the additional 50 stalls will have some positive influence. `1Ve are looking <br />at 5.75% interest and 2% annual increase on COP's for fmancing. Clarificatior~ was made on <br />whether we would excavate and then backfill with clean soil or just excavate for the parking <br />structure. <br />Mike Hafford, the structural engineer, has some concerns with the design. Pence Kelly has a <br />copy of plans from the state 's underground garage built a few years ago. Thay do not have <br />water proofing, just a 5" slab with #4 rebar on 16" centers and a typical drainage ;system. Plus <br />they had a"gift" with storm sewer access to Mill Creek for de-watering. Concetns on our site <br />include keeping water levels down, hydrostatic pressure and keeping costs down to deal with de- <br />watering issue. We are still looking at other options. The groundwater level is between 11-17 <br />feet underground and can vary on location. <br />Centurywest has received a bid from a subcontractor, GRI to complete the pump tests that are <br />required to find out what we will be looking at to determine how we can handle the de-watering <br />package. The question is who will they be working for? Centurywest has had discussions <br />with Mike Hafford as well and agree that pump tests aze necessary for the de-wat~ring plan and <br />we need to go forward. Estimates from GRI state they could not be available to start for <br />another two weeks. Discussions followed regarding volumes of water being pumped and if that <br />water is contaminated, it needs to be treated. We have limited capacity on storm se~wers as well. <br />We need to get calculated flow rates from the building, do the pump tests and at 1he same time <br />look at testing the water. Melvin Mark and Centurywest will discuss this course of action <br />further in a separate meeting. This data is essential to the decision we have to make regarding <br />the parking structure and is now the critical issue at hand. <br />GRI has stated that it will take two weeks to complete testing from time they start. They need <br />~' Page 2 of 5 <br />