My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:47:33 AM
Creation date
9/6/2011 10:03:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10302
Title
Development Team Meeting Notes (96-99)
BLDG Date
8/19/1997
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9601 Courthouse Square Research
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
430
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7-3 Dan inquired whether Civil has confirmed adequacy of services for other utilities, <br />~ i.e. gas, water. Byron wanted to know whether we had anything in writing regarding - <br />PGE's commitments, e.g. transformers. Leonard was not aware of anything in writing in <br />this regard ACTION: Leonard to confirm with Westech on other services and Interface <br />on commitments. <br />7-3 R.G. inquired about natural gas incentives. Byron indicated the project would use <br />substantial natural gas. ACTION: R.G. to contact his contact at the gas company. Rev. <br />7-10. Byron to contact Bruce at NWNG. <br />7-3 Byron expressed concern with the number and size of riser locations. Dan asked whether <br />either the County or Transit would require "clean". Neither Randy nor R.G. felt this <br />would be necessary. Leonard concurred. Rev. 7-10 R.G. contacted the radio station <br />regarding their power needs. They do have some clean power needs. ACTION: R.G. to <br />confirm what their needs are. <br />7-3 David confirmed that there is no money earmarked for a security system. ACTION: <br />Leonard will contact Bill McCune to get definition on security requirements so it can be <br />included in the Total Project Cost. <br />7-3 Byron expressed concern with the lack of coordination between the County, Transit, <br />Leonard and Dave on data communications. <br />Demolition <br />7-10 The team discussed responsibility for the removal of the curbs. Dave understood that <br />Staton would leave the curbs in place and remove later. Kathleen indicated that this was <br />not in Staton's scope of work. MMDC. ACTION: Kathleen will determine whether the <br />curbs and sidewalk are monolithic and either Pence / Kelly or Staton will need to include <br />in their scope of work. <br />7-3 Leonard inquired about status of site after Staton is complete. Leonard wanted to know <br />where to start the specifications. Kathleen informed the group that three feet of the <br />buildings' walls would remain to prevent water from seeping. Curbs will remain in place <br />but the sidewalks and asphalt will be gone. Approx. 35% of the site will have basements <br />remaining. Rev. 7-10 Dan recommended that the fountlations be removed as part of <br />Staton's scope of work. ACTION: Kathleen to provide change order estimate to <br />remove foundations. <br />Architectural <br />7-10 Ron asked about security considerations in the stairwells. ACTION: Randy and R.G. <br />will provide more definition on building access and security. <br />7-3 Ron expressed concern with size and number of restrooms. R.G. expressed concern with <br />distance from lease space. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.