My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Financial- COPS (Issuance)
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Financial- COPS (Issuance)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 2:26:27 PM
Creation date
8/23/2011 10:52:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10160
Title
Financial- COPS (Issuance)
Company
Marion County
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Finance
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
236
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
NOU 16 '96 14~02 FR PRU SECiPUB FINiSEA 206 340 4076 TO 915035885237 P.02 <br />/ <br />To: Billy Wasson <br />N(ike I~ansen <br />Scott Clements <br />From: Nancy Wat~Cins <br />Re: Mazion Caunty, Orc~on -- Updated Preliminary Numbers <br />Date: Novembcr 18, 1.998 <br />Please find updated numbers zelated to aur discussion oi~ Monday. Presented b~low are twu basic <br />scenarios ~, g~" sumcs there is not ~~Prc~ad~d ~ Without a Surpius Bon.d <br />,. , _ <br />Procecds cal~, the Couniy xs free to structure e issue witli premi~un bonds. "°~asstunes <br />theze is ,~`~- `F` ~~~s ~. This Scenario reflects how the PO is currently written. <br />With a Surplus Bond Proceeds cali, the County will not be able ia issue premium bands. <br />Roth Scenarios incorporate the same major assutnptions as the previous set of numbers_ 'l~esc are: <br />(i) fust principal payment date of June 1, 2001; (ii) z~et funding of the construc;tion fund assuming <br />4% reinvestment rate; (iii) constcuction drawdown schedule wluch begins March 1, ] 999 and <br />assumes level drawdowrxs until July l, 2000; (iv) total construction fund requirement (including <br />interest) of $20,300,000; (v} capitalized intcrest tluough Scpt~mber 1, 2000; and (vi} bond i.nsurance <br />pt~emium of 65 basis points. <br />As s~own in the attach~d Su~n.mary of Assumptions and Results, ~~~:=~, with the use of <br />premium bands, generates a eontingency o~~~~fter dcpositing to the Project Fund an aznourn <br />suFficient to yield $24,300,000 (wi.th Project Fund earaings). , which represents the <br />cwTent form of the bond issue, zesults in a negative contingency o ) bascd on a deposit to <br />the Project Fund of ary ~xnount suf~icient to yield $20,30Q,000 (wi }Project Fund eamin~s). If you <br />wou~d Iike me t~ chang~ any af the assumptions, pleasc Iet me know. As you can see, we are still <br />right on the linc. It is irnportant to reme~nl~r, huwever, tliat we have used v~ry loose assumptions <br />on the drawdown schedule for tlae Project Fund so there could very well bc more wig~le room than <br />it appears. If you have atxy questions please fecl free to call mc at (206) 344-4073. Thaiilc you for <br />your conside~ration. <br />cc: John Moflre <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.