Laserfiche WebLink
cost allocation because we are staying within the agreed costs and the agreed cost <br />splits. If the costs for the bus mall go down substantially, the transit district will want <br />to recalculate. Its total cost will go down, and it will not want to pay a percentage <br />that subsidizes the cost of county facilities. The same would hold true for the county. <br />The cost for maintenance of the bus ma11 is more firmly fixed. The transit district will <br />own the bus mall. The transit district is wholly responsible for maintenance of the bus <br />mall, including wear and tear to the ceiling slab. Structural repair and replacement of <br />the ceiling slab is split 50-50. See sections 4.1 and 4.2 of the condo agreement. A <br />copy is attached. If there is any question here, it will likely be found in the definition <br />of general common elements in section 4.1. Are any of the identified general common <br />e(ements, which are subject to a split of 20.07% transit district and 79.93% county, <br />properly assignable to the bus mall? Or, are any of the elements in the bus mall, <br />properly assignable as general common elements? <br />Chsq:costshare.mem <br />