Demolition Correspondence - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ent b}4: STATON CONSTRUCTION 1 541 4~1 0545; 05/05/97 11:58AM;,J~ #932;Page 2/3 praduct sales, dimensional lumber resale, interior ~rchit~ctural finish materiaf sales and mechanicat, ele~trical and plumbing companent sales. Statan has agreed through previous communication ta Marion County to negatiate with IVlarion County an the matter af additionat recycling with the intent ta reduce the cosi af the project to both Staton and Marion Caunty. Staton is anxious and willing t~ suppart thes~ negotia~ians with the underst~nding that it wilt be mutually beneficial to both parties. Negoti~tions for additional recycling credits will occur under the following conditions: 1.y Additionat reaycling credits ~hove $75,000.04 for this project witl be split an a 501~0 b~sis between SEatan and Marian County. The split will occur aft~r Staton menagement, removal and transportatiort costs have been deduoted frarn the additianal recycling revenue. Mana~ement, remav~l and transpartatian costs wilf be b~sed on the St~ton 1997 Rental Rate Sheet which is attachEd, and/ar direct involce casts far sub Gontracted work. 2.) Marion Caunty- must demonstrate th~t the additional r~cycling revenue has been generated as a direct result of Marion County ingenuity or resour~es, and that the revenue was nat included in th~ ariginal Statan proposal. 3.) Additional recycling proposals submitted hy Marian County may nat adversely impact St~ton's work sch~dule or project Gosts. 4.} At1 reaycting revenu~s to be split by Staton and Marion Caunty must bE agreed upon in ad~ance and executed via written cantract change ordsr. 6.) Demolition lndustry standard for d~termining tiemolition recYciing percentages is based on truck load count by volume, or weight by known valumetric/weight conversions. Marion Caunty has elected to achieve a 90~0 recycling goal by weigh'k. Stator~'s prQposal for recycling percentages is based 4n known volumetr~c/weight Gonversions tor demolitian. Weighing each load transported off site was not ~equired b+y the 6id specificatit~n nor pravided for in the Staton proposai. Costs for verification of recycli~g percentages by wei~ht, vis scate measurement, shall b~ the responsibilitY of Marian County. ITEMI 2~4.3 P~INALTI~: The assessment of monetary pen~lti~s for failure to achieve the 90°~6 recycling 8oal were not included in the bid specifi~atian and shall not be included in th~ cantract. 2