My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Cost Sharing Models
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Cost Sharing Models
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:02:22 AM
Creation date
8/9/2011 10:07:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10080
Title
Cost Sharing Models
Company
WEGroup Report 1993
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Design - Planning
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
145
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
h~ <br />~\~ ~'yh <br />Salem Area Mass Transit District <br />Courthouse Square <br />COST ALLOCATION <br />Purpose: The purpose of the cost allocation analysis is to establish <br />the reasonable basis for the payment of shared costs in the <br />Courthouse Square development and prorata payment of <br />construction related progress payments. <br />Principles: The partnership between Marion County and the Salem <br />Area Mass Transit District for Courthouse Square, as <br />memorialized by the Intergovernmental Agreement, enables <br />the two public agencies to realize savings through the <br />sharing of costs which otherwise would have accrued to an <br />individual agency. This cost allocation model will establish <br />the basis on which those costs will be reasonably shared <br />and, when completed, will deternzine each party's prorata. <br />share of the entire development project. In that manner, <br />all invoices for services to the project can be paid by the <br />paying agent upon receipt of each party's prorata share of <br />the invoice, rather than the untimely and costly necessity <br />of trying to determine the actual share of each invoice. <br />Given the condominium nature of the development and the <br />inter-mixed elements of the project, the latter method of <br />determining costs would be almost impossible, whereas, <br />the former proposed method, established by independent <br />cost-estimators and reaffirmed from the bids, provides a <br />simple, accurate, and cost-effective method of payment and <br />fiscal control. <br />Analysis: For purposes of this analysis, cost sharing has been <br />divided into four categories: <br />1. Land Related Costs <br />2. Special Considerations <br />3. Construction Related Costs <br />4. Change Orders <br />Land Related Casts: The property acquisition model, <br />previously approved by N'TA and recently updated in <br />accordance with the final design development plans, <br />established that Transit has acquired a 31.29% undivided <br />interest in the downtown block now known as Courthouse <br />Square and upon which the project will be developed. Cost <br />Ch2 Cost Allocation <br />09/23/98 <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.