My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Note Book: Miscellaneous
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Note Book: Miscellaneous
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/20/2012 7:39:42 AM
Creation date
8/8/2011 9:50:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10404
Title
Note Book: Miscellaneous
BLDG Date
1/1/1998
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Committee
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
> answered until we solicit proposals. this wouid take several months over <br />> this spring/summer. It is our view that this issue should not hold up the <br />> rest of the project. Our consuitants (costic arbuckle and melvin mark) do <br />> not see a problem with the North block development. <br />> 14b. The $1.30 analysis is completed and ready to include in your <br />> agenda. <br />Response to No 14b. Please send now, holed and tabbed. <br />----------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />----------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />> 14.c. This item is completed. We actually gave it to your at your last <br />> meeting. What is it that you want further? <br />----------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />----------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />Response to 14c. Where are these materials tabbed in the materials you <br />sent us? Or were they not tabbed? And where "are the costs assessed in <br />terms of their impact on county services?" I should add that in my memo <br />to SPOC members of March 5, 1998, I wrote: <br />"Are we certain that we don't have some of the things we're asking <br />for? (Example: Costs of renovating the Franklin Building and <br />courthouse.) It would be embarrassing to ask for data that we already <br />have." <br />Some of the SPOC members obviously believe (as stated in 14C) that more <br />detail is needed, and I think it fair to say that all of us want the costs <br />assessed "in terms of their impact on county services." Perhaps this will <br />be included in other materials you provide us. On the one hand, 1 don't <br />you spending a lot of time "divining" what we want. On the other hand, <br />the committee's concerns are set forth in 14c.) <br />------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />> 14d. I have asked Melvin Mark <br />to assess this issue <br />and give us an > analysis of the impact each $.10 has on the the proforma. <br />> 14e. This item was completed previously but I failed to share it with you, I <br />> did not know you had a need of the information. <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br />----------------------------------------------------------------- <br />Re 14e. Please send now, holed and tabbed. <br />> 3. and 14f. Not sure what you are seeking here. This could be a very <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.