Laserfiche WebLink
~ Oa~11~98 1a:02 $5035383526 CORRECTIONS 4VC ~~~ PERSONNEL I~OOg/009 <br />• cuts will occur to acco~nodate increased occupancy costs? <br />15. SPOC is concerned about the lack of accountability in <br />county government. With eleven department heads reporting directly <br />to a three-person board, SPOC questions whether accountab~lity <br />exists. If the project proceeds, SPOC recommends that both boards <br />take an active role in supervising the project. Do the two <br />entities have policies in place to prevent a repetition of any <br />mistakes made earlier? <br />16. No work should begin without written cantracts in place. <br />17. SPOC commends the district for implementing procedures <br />dealing with potential conflicts of interest. Soth entities should <br />have a policy prohibiting doing business with current board <br />members and staff and for a ane-year period after the person <br />leaves. <br />1$. While SPOC has to date tound no evidence of dishonesty on <br />the part of anyone, ~ <br />V a. The ro'ect was be un with no reasonable basis far <br />P 7 9 <br />financial feasibility, especially on the part of the county. <br />b. Project managers were hired with no contracts in <br />place. <br />c. Substantial amounts of taxpayers' money were wasted <br />because of poor planning and without a clearly definEd benefit to <br />the taxpayers. <br />d. SPOC has found it ditficult to obtain consistent and <br />correct financiai information. <br />e. SPOC believes that the Marion County Board of <br />6 <br />