Laserfiche WebLink
Men~o~and~u~n <br />To: Kathleen <br />From: Geoff <br />Date: September Z9, I997 <br />Re: Staton eontract submittals, waste disposal, recycIing, and salvage data <br />Staton appears to have met the submittal raquirements as outiined in your 9/I7/97 Ietter. I reviewed <br />the disposal, recycling, and salvage sale data, and they were, for the most part, in order. I went <br />through each individual receipt to verify quantity of materials recycled vs. disposed of and to verify <br />salvage revenue. Clarification on the following items wouId be helpfut: <br />I. The receipts for record numbers I4-Z0, Z6, 33-39, 43,44,47, and Z83-Z$6, alI of which were <br />disposed of at Kive~end Landfill, are handwritten on a singie sheet of paper. Where are the <br />dump reoeipts or tipping records7 <br />Z. The receipt for record Z6 shows a total of 90 tons of materiaI being recycIed, fiowever the <br />recycling report Iists it as I SJ tons. <br />3. Receipts for t~acords 40-4Z, 45, 46,SZ, and 53, an wri~ at wooa wasc~, sr~ ~o~g~ <br />oonsistenfIy lower than those tHat appear in the recycling report It Iooks tike this d'ifference <br />oomes from the couversion factor used to comert from cu~ic yards to tons. In tke above <br />receipts ~he conversion factor used is as Iow as .I$ while Iater in the report it is as Iugh as .41. ] <br />assume that is because tbe voIume/weight relations~iip changes as t~-e demolition wastes change <br />but shouIdn't the above weights be used as they were originally calculated7 <br />4. We bave no receipt for record 50, wIuch was a sale of doors for ~1,25d to a private parly. <br />5. In reoord 87, concrete is used as shoring material in the Lui building. When was this material <br />actually hauled off-site, and how did Staton differentiate between tlris material and basement <br />demolition wastes when calculating its recycling totals. <br />6. No weight is Iisted on original receipt for record 107. In the recycling report the weigiit is <br />Iisted as I3.Z tons. <br />7. Receipt for record 1941ists a ZZ.6 tons of debris d'isposed of, but the recycIing report onty Tists <br />I4.2 <br />8. Reoeipt for record Z6I lists a 3.1 tons of debris disposed of, but the recycling repod onIy Iists <br />Z.9. <br />