My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Interim Architect Agreement/Contract
>
CS_Courthouse Square
>
Interim Architect Agreement/Contract
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2012 11:47:23 AM
Creation date
8/2/2011 11:15:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Building
RecordID
10061
Title
Interim Architect Agreement/Contract
Company
Arbuckle/Costic
BLDG Date
1/1/1999
Building
Courthouse Square
BLDG Document Type
Contracts - Agreements
Project ID
CS9801 Courthouse Square Construction
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
346
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
08/19/97 11:11 <br />$503 588 0209 <br />SALEM TRANSIT <br />Salem Area Mass Transit 3140 Del Webb Ave. NE, Salem, Oregon 97303 <br />I~J 0 01 <br />Dishict <br />FAX <br />To: <br />Raady Curds 538-5495 <br />Mike Hansca 373-4367 <br />Bea Fethcrston <br />C~aig Leavis (503)223~606 <br />Phone: <br />Fax phone: <br />CC: <br />Date: p8/19/97 <br />Numbef of pagcs includsag covcr sheet: 3 <br />From: <br />R G. Andetsen-Wyckoff <br />General Maaagcr <br />Phonc: (503) 361-2550 <br />Fax phonc: (503} 538-0209 <br />REMARks: ^ Urgent ~ For your review ~ Reply ASAP a Plzasc comment <br />Gcntlcmen: Havir~ just retumed itom ~acadon, I am finally gettinF through A11 the correspondence in my in-basket and <br />wanted to react to tIie attached memo to Kim Arbuckle from Randy C~rtis, dated Av.gust 5. The memo would seem to indicate <br />that a communication ftom me comrnitted to pay 553,170 for addirional fifth floor and parkiag structure design work_ I have <br />attached my memo of July 21 to Rrbucklc Costic on this issue_ Pleasc not the footnote which do~s not commit to any giVen <br />amount, I only inidicatcd that we recognized there was some additiona] work done and rhat thc final contract would specify <br />our final agrecmcnt on thcse costs. I still have some concerns about their culpability on somc of the parking s~ucuture <br />enginceriag design costs and on their "handshake" agrecments with sub-consultants which tied fees to a budget which is, and <br />was, non-existant_ At any rate, I felt this clatificacion was necessary. I did not agree to any amount' T~G <br />~ <br />r, ~ <br />, ~° <br />;_ c. <br />:. ~ <br />i~.~ <br />cc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.