Laserfiche WebLink
3.4.19 <br />_ This paragraph weakens the "without limitation" language included in 2.1.1. We would <br />delete the entire paragraph. <br />4.6.1 <br />Although the language has already been modified to enhance the Owner's control, this <br />paragraph seems open-ended and vague. <br />4.10 <br />We would be inclined to add "...however, failure to give such notice shall not relieve the <br />Architect of its obligations under this Agreement" to the end of this paragraph. <br />8.5.1 <br />We would attempt to include language that the Architect should be obligated to continue <br />performa.nce under the Agreement pending resolution of any dispute. This is noted in the <br />FTA exhibit, but is probably worth reiterating in this paragraph. <br />10.5.11 <br />This pazagraph appears to be numbered incorrectly. It should be 11.5.1.1. <br />11.2.1 <br />As the project is now being bid, how could we better define/term "negotiated ha.rd <br />costs?" <br />Article 12 <br />This Article describes the previous project design. <br />