My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MANF - 1514480
Images9
>
Public Works - Permits
>
Building
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
COMPLETED FILES - INACTIVE
>
98-XXXXX
>
MANF - 1514480
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2010 8:32:37 AM
Creation date
11/16/2004 12:40:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Permits
Permit Address
11654 BUNTING LN NE
Permit City
Aurora
Permit Number
555-98-03204
Parcel Number
031W33CB05200
Permit Type
MANF
Permit Doc Type
Permit Document
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FRO?l : TERRA FIRMA GEOTECHNICAL PHONE NO. : 541 367 8178 Jut. 50 1999 02: 19PM P03 <br /> <br />James Grlffiths Excavating, Inc. <br />Berger Residence <br /> <br />July 30, 1999 <br /> Page 2 <br /> <br />The slope was covered with plastic sheeting at the time of the site visit. Terra Firms did not <br />directly observe the slope face. Observations at the top of the slope indicated no tension <br />cracks or seffiement. Minor drying cracks were observed on the slope face outs]de the area <br />covered with plastic sheeting. <br /> <br />Conclusions and Recommendations <br /> <br />Lon;I Term Slope Stability. The county's concerns regarding the placement of loose soil on <br />a steep, vegetated slope are in general valid. The presence of the fill on the slope is <br />undesirable with respect to the long-term stability of the stope The decomposing vegetation <br />will, within e period of about one to five years, result in the development of a weak, inclined <br />surface on which the overlying soil will be predisposed to slip. <br /> <br />in order to fill this slope successfully, the ~ooss fill should be removed, the original slope face <br />stripped of vegetation and topsoil, and the slope face benched to prepare it for permanent <br />filling. The slope dimensions will require retention. However, it will not be feasible to simply <br />increase the height of the existing retaining wall without also reinforcing it structurally. <br /> <br />A new retaining system would probably be required at the toe of the slope, The height and <br />position of the new wall would depend in part on the desired appearance of the finished <br />grading. In general, a single wail about eight feet high, located immediately adjacent to the <br />existing wall, or a series of two or three Iow wails spaced a suitable distance apart, would <br />be appropriate. Wails more than four feet high and walls with sloping backfill surfaces must <br />be engineered. The walls could be constructed of concrete, boulders, reinforced fill faced <br />with architectural stone, or soldier piles and lagging. Cottage block with unreinforced fill will <br />not be adequate for the purpose. Terra Firms is qualified and available to design boulder <br />walls, reinforced fill walls, and pile walls, and to provide soil characteristics to a structural <br />engineer to design reinforced concrete walls. <br /> <br />Sh~)d; Term Slope Stability. The presence of the loose fill on the slope face does not appear <br />to pose an immediate threat to the stability of the slope or the structure. However, the <br />steepness of the slope and the presence of the fill pose a moderate risk that some type of <br />failure might develop during periods of high moisture. The potential risk to the house is <br />partly mitigated by the setback and depth of the structure's east footing, and by the inherent <br />rigidity of most manufactured homes which enables them to withstand a greater amount of <br />displacement from ground movement than a comparable, site~built home. Terra Firma's <br />primary recommendation is for the homeowner to progress toward a permanent solution in <br />the form of retaining walls and regraded slopes this year if funding and construction <br />schedules allow. If the project, including design, permiffingl and construction, cannot be <br />completed before the end of October of this year, the construction phase should be <br />postponed until next summer. <br /> <br />The stability of the slope over the coming winter can be substantially improved by reducing <br />the opportunity for surface water to infiltrate the slope. The slope face should be covered <br />with an intact plastic sheet from the end el~ October through next May The sheet should <br />extend over the top of the existing retaining wall. The sheet must be securely anchored at <br />all edges using tires, rocks, sandbags, or other suitably heavy weights. Weights should also <br />be spaced about 10 to 15 feet apart across the sheet. Periodic inspection of the sheet <br />should be made throughout the winter. Rips or holes should be promptly patched with <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.