My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CU26-022 Staff Decision
Images9
>
Public Works - Planning
>
FOR PUBLIC VIEW ON INTERNET
>
2026
>
Conditional Use
>
CU26-022 Staff Decision
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/14/2026 10:38:54 AM
Creation date
7/14/2026 10:39:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Land Use
Case_Number
26-022
Document_Date
7/14/2026
Land Use Type
Conditional Use
Tax_Lot_Number
072W33C000500
Document_Type
Decision
Site_Address
5615 MACLEAY RD SE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The applicants provided information regarding the different types of agricultural operation that exist in the local area. <br />They identified a nursery tree farm and grass seed/hay operations as the predominant forms of agricultural operations <br />in the local area surround the subject property. They also identified that their business could impact neighboring farm <br />operations via dust, noise, fumes from equipment, and additional traffic generation. They then addressed how each <br />of these different avenues of impact will be mitigated or how they do not constitute significant risks to neighboring <br />farm operations. The applicants explain that dust control methods during dry periods will be utilized and how the <br />areas of vehicle traffic on the subject parcel are already graveled which reduces the dust generated by vehicles. They <br />also state that they will maintain the condition of the property and add landscaping to provide a buffer to neighboring <br />parcels. To mitigate the impact of fumes and noise generated by machinery used in the landscaping business, the <br />applicants stated they will limit excessive equipment idling. Lastly, the applicants explained that their landscape <br />contracting business is not open to the public, does not involve retail sales or visits to the property, and currently has <br />under 9 employees. They stated that employees arrive at 8am to pick up the vehicles and are dispatched in groups of <br />3 employees per vehicle. Employee shifts end typically around 4pm. Outside of the dispatch and return times, traffic <br />to the property is not frequent and will not produce a significant adverse impact to neighboring properties. <br /> <br /> c. For purposes of subsection (a) and (b), a determination of forcing a significant change in <br /> accepted farm or forest practices on surrounding lands devoted to farm and forest use or a <br /> determination of whether the use will significantly increase the cost of accepted farm or forest practices <br /> on surrounding lands devoted to farm or forest use requires: <br /> <br />i. Identification and description of the surrounding lands, the farm and forest operations on those <br />lands, and the accepted farm practices on each farm operation and the accepted forest practices <br />on each forest operation; <br /> <br /> This section outlines considerations for the previous criteria sections. <br /> <br />ii. An assessment of the individual impacts to each farm and forest practice, and whether the <br />proposed use is likely to have an important influence or effect on any of those practices. This <br />assessment applies practice by practice and farm by farm; and <br /> This section outlines considerations for the previous criteria sections. <br /> <br />iii. An assessment of whether all identified impacts of the proposed use when considered together <br />could have a significant impact to any farm or forest operation in the surrounding area in a manner <br />that is likely to have an important influence or effect on that operation. <br /> <br /> This section outlines considerations for the previous criteria sections. <br /> <br />iv. For purposes of this subsection, examples of potential impacts for consideration may include <br />but are not limited to traffic, water availability and delivery, introduction of weeds or pests, damage <br />to crops or livestock, litter, trespass, reduction in crop yields, or flooding. <br /> <br /> This section outlines considerations for the previous criteria sections. <br /> <br />v. For purposes of subsection (a) and (b), potential impacts to farm and forest practices or the cost <br />of farm and forest practices, impacts relating to the construction or installation of the proposed <br />use shall be deemed part of the use itself for the purpose of conducting a review under subsection <br />(a) and (b). <br /> <br />This section outlines considerations for the previous criteria sections. <br /> <br />vi. In the consideration of potentially mitigating conditions of approval under ORS215.296(2), the <br />governing body may not impose such a condition upon the owner of the affected farm or forest land <br />or on such land itself, nor compel said owner to accept payment to compensate for the significant <br />changes or significant increases in costs described in subsection (a) and (b). <br /> <br />This section outlines limitations on jurisdictions to impose conditions upon affected farm or forest <br />landowners. No conditions are being assessed to neighboring affected farm or forest landowners. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.