Laserfiche WebLink
3. Survey checking fee required at the time of review. <br />4. Property line adjustment deed(s) shall be recorded with the Marion County Clerk’s Office. Per <br />ORS 92.190 (4). <br /> <br />Marion County Assessor’s Office provided information regarding taxes on the subject properties. <br /> <br />Marion County Building commented: “It is recommended any new property lines be established at least 3 feet <br />from any existing residential use structure and at least 10 feet from any existing commercial use structure, if <br />applicable.” <br /> <br />All other contacted agencies either failed to comment or stated no objection to the proposal. <br />7. The criteria for reviewing lot line adjustments within an EFU zone are listed in Chapter 17.136.090(C) MCC. <br />These criteria are as follows: <br /> <br />1. When one or more lots or parcels subject to a proposed property line adjustment are larger than the <br />minimum parcel size pursuant to subsection (A)(1) of this section, the same number of lots or parcels shall <br />be as large or larger than the minimum parcel size after the adjustment. When all lots or parcels subject to <br />the proposed adjustment are as large or larger than the minimum parcel size, no lot or parcel shall be <br />reduced below the applicable minimum parcel size. If all lots or parcels are smaller than th e minimum <br />parcel size before the property line adjustment, the minimum parcel size pursuant to this section does not <br />apply to those lots or parcels. <br /> <br />None of the subject lots or parcels are above the minimum parcel size of 80-acres. Therefore, this criterion <br />does not apply. <br /> <br />2. If the minimum parcel size in subsection (A)(1) of this section is larger than 80 acres, and a lot or parcel <br />subject to property line adjustment is smaller than the minimum parcel size but larger than 80 acres, the <br />lot or parcel shall not be reduced in size through property line adjustment to less than 80 acres. <br /> <br />Again, none of the subject lots or parcels are above the minimum parcel size of 80-acres. Therefore, this <br />criterion does not apply. <br /> <br />3. Any property line adjustment shall result in a configuration of lots or parcels that are at least as suitable <br />for commercial agriculture as were the parcels prior to the adjustment. <br /> <br />The proposal will lead to the expansion of the property lines of the parcel developed with the dwelling and <br />one accessory building. The land being absorbed into the dwelling lot is not in active farm use. This will <br />create a clear separation from the farmed property and the non-farming homesite property. Ultimately, the <br />proposal will locate the property lines in a way that better reflects the existing land use pattern. The criterion <br />is met. <br /> <br />4. A property line adjustment may not be used to: <br />a. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that, before the relocation or elimination of the common <br />property line, is smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size for the applicable zone and contains <br />an existing dwelling or is approved for the construction of a dwelling, if the abutting vacant <br />tract would be increased to a size as large as or larger than the minimum tract size required to <br />qualify the vacant tract for a dwelling; <br /> <br />No parcel is being increased to a size that would qualify the tract for a dwelling. The larger parcel, tax lot <br />1300, is smaller than the minimum parcel size, and will remain smaller after the property line adjustment. <br />Tax lot 1300 already has a dwelling on it and tax lot 200 has never been approved for a dwelling. <br />Furthermore, the applicants are not proposing any development. Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />b. Decrease the size of a lot or parcel that contains an existing dwelling or is approved for <br />construction of a dwelling to a size smaller than the minimum lot or parcel size, if the abutting