Laserfiche WebLink
The proposal of the applicants is to build onto an existing accessory structure in their backyard. There are two <br />sections of additions; one that extends flush with the existing structure’s setback along the west property line; and <br />the second branching off the east side of the existing structure and meeting up with the other addition 22 feet from <br />the north property line. The 10 foot 4 inch setback from the west side property line will be not be met by the new <br />addition. The west side abuts the driveway access for a flag lot to the north of the subject property. As such, the <br />only future development on the side with the reduced setback will be resurfacing of the existing driveway. The <br />existing structure has thus far not caused any issues to the driveway for the neighboring properties, so the <br />expansion of the structure at this existing setback is unlikely to create new issues for the existing driveway. <br />Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />(b) The adjustment will not have a significant adverse affect upon the health or safety of persons working or <br />residing in the vicinity; and <br /> <br />The proposed adjustment is to reduce the setbacks for a residential accessory structure so that the property owner <br />can build onto an existing structure at a setback that would not meet the requirements for part of the new <br />additions. The new additions will be flush with the existing setback to the west property line and the development <br />will be fully permitted to meet the modern building permit standards. It is unlikely that this accessory structure <br />will cause any significant adverse effects to the health and safety of persons in the area, as it will not impact <br />visibility at an intersection and will be built to modern building code. Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />(c). The adjustment is the minimum necessary to achieve the purpose of the adjustment and is the minimum <br />necessary to permit development of the property for the proposed use; and <br /> <br />The applicants provided detailed plans of the proposed additions onto the structure showing how the new addition <br />along the west property line will be flush with the existing structure and that the existing distance is 8 feet from <br />the property line. The proposed adjustment of the setback by 2 feet and 4 inches is therefore the minimum amount <br />to achieve the proposed development. The criterion is met. <br /> <br />(d) The intent and purpose of the specific provision to be adjusted is clearly inapplicable under the <br />circumstances; or, the proposed development maintains the intent and purpose of the provision to be <br />adjusted. <br /> <br />MCC 17.117.030 controls for the height of residential accessory structures in the AR zone, and it requires that <br />residential accessory structures taller than 9 feet must be set back 1 foot from the property line for each additional <br />foot above 9 feet the structure is built. One of the additions has a measuring point height of 19 feet 4 inches, <br />meaning the setback for the entire structure is 10 feet 4 inches. The existing structure is closer to the property line <br />than this new required setback, so some of the new additions will not be conforming. However, the addition to the <br />structure along this property line is not the section triggering the further setback. The addition along the west <br />property line is 1 story tall and only reaches a peak height of 14 feet. If the rest of the additions were the same <br />height, the setback would only be 5 feet to the property line. As such, approval of this proposal will still maintain <br />the purpose the setback provision because the tallest part of the addition will still meet the full required setback. <br />Therefore, the criterion is met. <br /> <br />9. Based on the above discussion, it has been determined that the request satisfies all applicable criteria and is, <br />therefore, APPROVED. <br /> <br /> <br />Brandon Reich Date: May 13th, 2026 <br />Planning Director/Zoning Administrator <br /> <br />If you have any questions regarding this decision contact Alexander Seifer at (503) 588-5038 <br /> <br />Notice to Mortgagee, Lienholder, Vendor or Seller: ORS Chapter 215 requires that if you receive this Notice, it must <br />promptly be forwarded to the purchaser.