Laserfiche WebLink
Open Space Land Designation 93-1 • <br /> Page 2 <br /> Tax Account Requested Deferral Acres Estimated Present Assessed <br /> Value of Deferred Area • <br /> 70130-381 ti'° 3.4 $28,382 <br /> 59427-000 t' 10.6 $20,810 <br /> 59446-002 ? 4.9 $N/A (1) <br /> 59446-000 94.4 $22,076 <br /> 59444-000 36.7 $10,987 <br /> Totals 150.0 $82,254 <br /> • <br /> Note: (1) This parcel has not yet had a value established by the assessor as it is the product of a <br /> recent partitioning. <br /> • <br /> Given the low estimated values for the area under consideration due to existing timber and farm <br /> deferrals, it is apparent that an increase in assessed value is to the City's advantage. The land will <br /> have a higher taxable value assessed as a golf course deferral than its present timber/farm deferred <br /> value. The advantage is both in terms of using higher value to increase revenue to the City's tax <br /> base and in reducing the City's debt service levy tax rates. <br /> What hypothetical tax rates are possible? <br /> There are two additional scenarios which demonstrate the hypothetical effect on tax rates: <br /> 1) Assume a golf course deferred value of $6,000,000 (the value which the assessor might <br /> place on the golf course as open space.) <br /> 2) Assume that the raw land is available for a highest and best use as single family residential • <br /> at a value of $50,000 per acre, giving a hypothetical value of $7,500,000. <br /> As presented in Attachment A, the aggregate effect is to slightly decrease property tax rates within <br /> Salem. <br /> What would be the hypothetical revenue differences to the City? <br /> Multiplying the various hypothetical assessed values by the City's composite tax rate per thousand <br /> would result in the following: <br /> $ 6 Millon Assessed Value: $33,023 additional revenue <br /> $ 7.5 Million Assessed Value: $41,277 additional revenue <br /> The extent which the golf course adds to the value of the associated residential development is <br /> speculative, but the subjective conclusion is that the golf course would add to the residential units' <br /> value for taxation purposes. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> The Planning Commission has two alternatives: <br /> A. Recommend to the City Council that the Creekside Golf Course be designated open space <br /> land, or <br /> B. Recommend to the e City Council that the Creekside Golf Course not be designated open <br /> space land. <br />